2018
DOI: 10.1186/s12889-018-5877-8
|View full text |Cite|
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Tailoring lifestyle interventions to low socio-economic populations: a qualitative study

Abstract: BackgroundPeople living in deprived areas are more likely to be overweight or obese, have poorer health outcomes, and tend to benefit less from interventions than those from more affluent backgrounds. One approach to address such health inequalities is to tailor existing interventions to low socio-economic populations, yet there is limited evidence to inform their design. This study aims to identify how best to tailor lifestyle interventions to low socio-economic populations to improve outcomes.MethodsFollowin… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

2
73
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
2
1

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 62 publications
(75 citation statements)
references
References 42 publications
2
73
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This population tends to drop out of research earlier, engage less with and have poorer adherence rates to weight loss interventions . The first stage of designing the intervention was a qualitative study, which aimed to identify the particular barriers to lifestyle behaviour change for this population, reported elsewhere . Following this, the findings were framed within the constructs of the COM‐B model and the intervention was designed following the principles of the Behaviour Change Wheel, described elsewhere .…”
Section: Methods Of Ppimentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…This population tends to drop out of research earlier, engage less with and have poorer adherence rates to weight loss interventions . The first stage of designing the intervention was a qualitative study, which aimed to identify the particular barriers to lifestyle behaviour change for this population, reported elsewhere . Following this, the findings were framed within the constructs of the COM‐B model and the intervention was designed following the principles of the Behaviour Change Wheel, described elsewhere .…”
Section: Methods Of Ppimentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Staff had practical knowledge about what would work within the service/population, and service users have valuable opinions on what they would like or use. Involving a larger group of service users (rather than a ‘Research Buddy’ approach for example) was deemed suitable given the diversity in knowledge and abilities identified in the first qualitative study, and a more participatory approach was not used given the time limitations. The researcher approached staff already involved in the research, and through the staff identified a suitable service user group to involve.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…22,23 When they do participate, vulnerable patients benefit less from health promotion interventions, compared to patients of higher socioeconomic status. 24 Previous studies have shown that tailoring care to specific groups can be effective in supporting health behavior change. 25,26 However, little is known about what challenges such interventions should address to ensure participation, retention, and benefit for vulnerable persons.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Making all services free at the point of use needs to be considered, alongside a proper economic evaluation to determine the cost effectiveness of such a strategy. These facilitators were also identi ed in a recent study addressing how lifestyle interventions could be tailored to improve access and ultimately outcomes for low socio-economic populations (33). The importance of consulting the target population to better understand their service needs and to ensure services developed are relevant and appropriate cannot be overlooked (26).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%