Tailored Web-Based Interventions for Pain: Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

Abstract

BackgroundEfforts have multiplied in the past decade to underline the importance of pain management. For both acute and chronic pain management, various barriers generate considerable treatment accessibility issues, thereby providing an opportunity for alternative intervention formats to be implemented. Several systematic reviews on Web-based interventions with a large emphasis on chronic pain and cognitive behavioral therapy have been recently conducted to explore the influence of these interventions on pain management However, to our knowledge, the specific contribution of tailored Web-based interventions for pain management has not been described and their effect on pain has not been evaluated.ObjectiveThe primary aim of this systematic review was to answer the following research question: What is the effect of tailored Web-based pain management interventions for adults on pain intensity compared with usual care, face-to-face interventions, and standardized Web-based interventions? A secondary aim was to examine the effects of these interventions on physical and psychological functions.MethodsWe conducted a systematic review of articles published from January 2000 to December 2015. We used the DerSimonian-Laird random effects models with 95% confidence intervals to calculate effect estimates for all analyses. We calculated standardized mean differences from extracted means and standard deviations, as outcome variables were measured on different continuous scales. We evaluated 5 different outcomes: pain intensity (primary outcome), pain-related disability, anxiety, depression, and pain catastrophizing. We assessed effects according to 3 time intervals: short term (<1 month), medium term (1-6 months), and long term (6-12 months).ResultsAfter full-text review, we excluded 31 articles, resulting in 17 eligible studies. Only 1 study concerned acute pain and was removed from the meta-analysis, resulting in 16 studies available for quantitative assessment. Compared with standard care or a waiting list, tailored Web-based intervention showed benefits immediately after, with small effect sizes (<0.40) for pain intensity (10 randomized controlled trials [RCTs], n=1310, P=.003) and pain-related disability (6 RCTs, n=953, P<.001). No other improvements were observed at follow-up in the medium and long terms. Compared with the active control group, no improvements were found for the primary outcome (pain intensity) or any of the outcomes except for a small effect size on pain catastrophizing (2 RCTs, n=333, P<.001) immediately after the intervention.ConclusionsTailored Web-based interventions did not prove to be more efficacious than standardized Web-based interventions in terms of pain intensity, pain-related disability, anxiety, and depression. An interesting finding was that some efficacy was shown on pain catastrophizing compared with active control interventions. Considering the diversity of approaches used in tailored Web-based interventions for chronic pain management, their efficacy is yet to be explored. Moreover,...

Telemonitoring in Chronic Pain Management Using Smartphone Apps: A Randomized Controlled Trial Comparing Usual Assessment against App-Based Monitoring with and without Clinical Alarms

“…For several years, it has been argued that eHealth and particularly mHealth will inevitably change our health systems in general [ 63 ] and pain management in particular [ 45 ]. To date, the focus of existing eHealth and mHealth solutions in pain settings has been mostly placed on self-administered treatments, mostly of psychological or alternatively of physical therapy nature [ 64 , 65 , 66 ]. While developing alternatives to face-to-face multidimensional treatments for chronic pain is indeed important, most patients still advocate individual, face-to-face treatments [ 67 ] and the first-line intervention for patients with chronic pain, namely medical treatment, will probably continue to require some patient-professional face-to-face interaction.…”

The use of an E-pain technology in the management of chronic pain. Case report

“…The reduction of pain intensity observed may have been influenced by several factors which were not possible to be controlled as the therapist-patient relationship, the placebo effect, the average regression, etc. However, the modification in other outcomes as the reduction in catastrophizing, kinesiophobia and the decrease of the limitations have been reported in other studies that evaluated the education in pain 22,23,27,28 . The satisfaction with the online intervention has also been reported as positive 25 .…”

An investigation of healthcare utilization and its association with levels of health literacy in individuals with chronic pain

“…Books such as Explain pain , by Butler and Moseley () are used to describe the mechanisms of chronic pain development to patients, and computer software such as PhysioTools®, which generates paper‐based exercise and rehabilitation programmes, are commonly used in physiotherapy settings. In addition, healthcare professionals are increasingly relying on online resources to provide education and facilitate the maintenance of self‐management strategies for chronic pain patients (Martorella et al, ), all of which require adequate levels of prose literacy for effective engagement. Nevertheless, although prose literacy is vital to accessing and engaging the aforementioned resources, future studies must consider all components of HL, including the impact of communication and information‐seeking skills on health outcomes in chronic pain patients, and how HL‐sensitive interventions can foster their development.…”