Tailored Web-Based Information for Younger and Older Patients with Cancer: Randomized Controlled Trial of a Preparatory Educational Intervention on Patient Outcomes

Abstract

Background Many patients with cancer, including older patients (aged ≥65 years), consult the Web to prepare for their doctor’s visit. In particular, older patients have varying needs regarding the mode in which information is presented (eg, via textual, visual, or audiovisual modes) owing to age-related sensory (eg, impaired vision and hearing) and cognitive decline (eg, reduced processing speed). Therefore, Web-based information targeted at older patient populations is likely to be used and processed more effectively, and evaluated more positively, when tailored to age-related capabilities and preferences. This, in turn, may benefit patient outcomes. Objective This randomized controlled trial tested the effects of a Web-based tailored educational intervention among newly diagnosed younger (<65 years) and older (≥65 years) patients with cancer. We compared the intervention group who viewed a mode-tailored website (ie, enabling patients to tailor information using textual, visual, and audiovisual modes) with 3 control groups view a nontailored website (ie, text only, text with images, and text with videos). We examined website experience outcomes (ie, website satisfaction, website involvement, knowledge, anxiety, and communication self-efficacy) and consultation experience outcomes (ie, question asking during consultation, anxiety, and information recall). Methods Patients from a multidisciplinary outpatient clinic (N=232) viewed a mode-tailored or nontailored website as preparation before their hospital consultations to discuss diagnosis and treatment. Data were collected before (T1), during (T2), and after (T3) visitation. Website experience outcomes were assessed with questionnaires (T1). Patients’ question asking was coded from videotaped consultations, and anxiety was assessed through a questionnaire (T2). Telephone interviews were conducted to assess knowledge acquired from the website before (T1) and after consultation (T3), and information recall from the consultation (T3). Results The preparatory website was well used across all conditions (mean 34 min). Younger patients viewing the mode-tailored website were more satisfied before consultation (P=.02) and reported lower anxiety after consultation (P=.046; vs text only). This pattern was not found in older patients. Mode tailoring yielded no other significant differences in patient outcomes. Regression analyses showed that website involvement (beta=.15; P=.03) and, to a lesser extent, website satisfaction (beta=.15; P=.05) positively associated with knowledge before consultation (T1). In turn, higher knowledge before consultation (beta=.39; P<.001), together with time on the website (beta=.21; P=.002; T1), predicted information recall from consultations (T3). Patients with higher knowledge before consultation (T1) also reported higher knowledge from the website afterward (T3; beta=.22; P=.003). Conclusions Offering preparatory online information before consultations benefits information processing and patient outcomes of both younger and older newly diagnosed patients with cancer. Younger patients benefit even more when information is offered in a mode-tailored manner. We discuss the theoretical, methodological, and practical implications for patient-provider communication research in an electronic health era. Clinical Trial Netherlands Trial Register NTR5904; https://www.trialregister.nl/trial/5750

Patient and physician shared decision making behaviors in oncology: Evidence on adequate measurement properties of the iSHARE questionnaires

“…Two recent studies in Dutch cancer patients [38,39] showed substantially lower SDM-Q-9 scores and higher decisional conflict scores. In addition, two recent studies in Dutch cancer patients [40] and Dutch cancer survivors [41] showed somewhat lower patients' perceived self-efficacy compared to our sample. It is therefore important to await the scores in other samples before drawing definitive conclusions about the high scores.…”

Systematic review of self‐management interventions for older adults with cancer

“…Of the 13 studies included in our review, nine are RCTs and four are quasi‐experimental studies 35 . Six studies were conducted in the United States, 36–40 while the remaining studies were conducted in Sweden, 41 Northern Ireland, 42 the Netherlands, 43 United Kingdom, 44 Malaysia, 45 Iran 46 and Norway 47 . All studies included were published between 2007 and 2019.…”

Customization versus Personalisation of Digital Health Information

“…Two recent studies applying a user-driven customisation approach to mode tailoring found that allowing participants to self-select textual, visual and audiovisual elements on a health website while viewing the information benefited website evaluations and information recall (Nguyen et al, 2017(Nguyen et al, , 2018. Furthermore, a different study showed that a preparatory website where cancer patients could customise the mode of information presentation decreased anxiety, whereas non-tailored versions of the website did not (Nguyen et al, 2019). Altogether, the current scholarship on mode tailoring has examined different tailoring strategies (i.e., customisation and personalisation) separately and operationalised them in different ways.…”