2022
DOI: 10.1002/adfm.202270165
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Tailor‐Engineered 2D Cocatalysts: Harnessing Electron–Hole Redox Center of 2D g‐C3N4 Photocatalysts toward Solar‐to‐Chemical Conversion and Environmental Purification (Adv. Funct. Mater. 29/2022)

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
11
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 14 publications
(13 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
11
0
Order By: Relevance
“…[ 8–10 ] Therein, the most critical point for the selection of semiconductor materials is the appropriate bandgap, which must meet the demand for visible light response and thermodynamic hydrogen proton reduction. [ 11,12 ] Additionally, the high carrier separation and transfer efficiency also should be their potential. [ 13 ] Therefore, the development of efficient and stable photocatalysts for HER remains a great challenge.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…[ 8–10 ] Therein, the most critical point for the selection of semiconductor materials is the appropriate bandgap, which must meet the demand for visible light response and thermodynamic hydrogen proton reduction. [ 11,12 ] Additionally, the high carrier separation and transfer efficiency also should be their potential. [ 13 ] Therefore, the development of efficient and stable photocatalysts for HER remains a great challenge.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The DOS of AFO/GCN is mainly contributed by AFO (Figure 1f), which is beneficial for enhancing the light absorption of the composite in the visible region. [38] Figure 1g shows the differential charge density diagram of the AFO/GCN heterojunction, with the yellow and blue region representing electron accumulation and depletion, respectively. Evidently, charge redistribution occurs between AFO and GCN, resulting in electrons transferring from GCN to AFO, and eventually concentrating on the AFO side.…”
Section: Theoretical Prediction Of the Formation Of Interface Electri...mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This may be due to the fact that the GGA function underestimates the bandgap in DFT calculations. [38] The VB energy of GCN and AFO measured by VB-XPS is 1.24 and 2.39 eV, respectively, and their VB values versus normal hydrogen electrode (NHE) can be determined to be 1.3 and 2.45 eV, respectively. [45] Therefore, the CB values of GCN and AFO can be calculated to be −1.23 and −0.43 eV, respectively, according to the relationships between E g , VB, and CB.…”
Section: Analysis Of Band Structure and Charge Transfer Mechanismmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…[ 2 ] In particular, the elaborately embellished metal ions/clusters in secondary building units (SBUs) of MOFs have recently been shown to achieve inert CH bonds activation and transformation through simultaneously integrating the ligand‐to‐metal charge transfer (LMCT) and hydrogen atom transfer (HAT) events together into metal–organic frameworks. [ 3 ] In the meantime, the past decade has witnessed remarkable advances in vibrant 2D layered nanosized catalytic materials possessing ultrathin thickness research area because of their high surface areas and abundant readily accessible active sites, [ 4 ] such as metal oxides and hydroxides, [ 5 ] boron/carbon nitride, [ 6 ] graphene and graphene oxide, [ 7 ] and transition metal dichalcogenides, [ 8 ] which enhance the communications between the catalytic active sites and substrate molecules and minimize the pathways associated with mass/charge transfer. [ 4,9 ]…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%