1993
DOI: 10.1007/bf00173776
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Tail loss reduces mating success in the Iberian rock-lizard, Lacerta monticola

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
5

Citation Types

2
68
2
3

Year Published

2002
2002
2016
2016

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 132 publications
(75 citation statements)
references
References 28 publications
2
68
2
3
Order By: Relevance
“…Although the immediate benefits of caudal autotomy are obvious, potential costs are numerous, if less clear, and may include energetic constraints (Ballinger and Tinkle, 1979;Congdon et al, 1974;Dial and Fitzpatrick, 1981;Naya et al, 2007), loss of social status (Fox et al, 1990;Fox and Rostker, 1982), decrements in locomotor speed and endurance Brown et al, 1995;Chapple et al, 2004;Daniels, 1985;Lin et al, 2006;Martin and Avery, 1998;Punzo, 1982) and reductions in territory size and access to females (Martin and Salvador, 1993;Salvador et al, 1995;Salvador et al, 1996). Given the high frequency with which lizards lose and regenerate parts of their tails in natural populations (in some studies greater than 50%) (Vitt et al, 1977) and the potential range of costs imposed, the functional consequences of tail loss are ecologically important.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Although the immediate benefits of caudal autotomy are obvious, potential costs are numerous, if less clear, and may include energetic constraints (Ballinger and Tinkle, 1979;Congdon et al, 1974;Dial and Fitzpatrick, 1981;Naya et al, 2007), loss of social status (Fox et al, 1990;Fox and Rostker, 1982), decrements in locomotor speed and endurance Brown et al, 1995;Chapple et al, 2004;Daniels, 1985;Lin et al, 2006;Martin and Avery, 1998;Punzo, 1982) and reductions in territory size and access to females (Martin and Salvador, 1993;Salvador et al, 1995;Salvador et al, 1996). Given the high frequency with which lizards lose and regenerate parts of their tails in natural populations (in some studies greater than 50%) (Vitt et al, 1977) and the potential range of costs imposed, the functional consequences of tail loss are ecologically important.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Lizard tails may have important functions such as balancing the body while perched (Ballinger 1973), storing energy in the form of fat, and aiding in locomotion (Vitt and Ballinger 1982). Additionally, lizards with non-autotomized tails tend to occupy dominant status in social hierarchies (Martín and Salvador 1993). Thus, loss of part of the tail may impose costs for lizards such as reduced growth (Niewiarowski et al 1997) and impaired reproduction (Martín and Salvador 1993).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Additionally, lizards with non-autotomized tails tend to occupy dominant status in social hierarchies (Martín and Salvador 1993). Thus, loss of part of the tail may impose costs for lizards such as reduced growth (Niewiarowski et al 1997) and impaired reproduction (Martín and Salvador 1993).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Sin embargo, no en todos los taxa el afecto por perder la cola es el mismo, pues las consecuencias dependerán de la función que este órgano cumple en cada uno de ellos. Por ejemplo, en Cnemidophorus ( = Aspidoscelis) sexlinetus, Cophosaurus texanus, Podarcis muralis, Scincella lateralis y Uma notata se encontró que perder la cola entorpece la locomoción y reduce la velocidad de escape (Ballinger et al 1979;Brown et al1995;Dial 1984;Punzo 1982); mientras que en Uta stansburiana disminuyó su rango social (Fox et al 1998;Fox & Rostker 1982); en Coleonyx brevis, Lacerta montícola, Mabuya heathi, Psammodromus algiricus, y U. stansburiana, se observó una reducción en el éxito reproductor (Dial & Fitzpatrick 1981;Fox & McCoy 2000;Martin & Salvador 1993;Salvador et al 1996;Vitt 1981); en Psammodromus algiricus la captura de presas fue afectada negativamente (Martin & Avery 1997), mientras que en S. lateralis, el comportamiento defensivo se modificó (Formanowicz et al 1990a).…”
Section: Introductionunclassified