2018
DOI: 10.1016/j.chest.2018.06.037
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Tai Chi Is Not Equivalent to Pulmonary Rehabilitation

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
2
1

Relationship

0
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 6 publications
(4 reference statements)
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In a randomized, double-blind phase IIIb study (NCT03095456), 207 patients with moderate to very severe COPD and suboptimal PIFR (< 60 L/min) were randomized to receive revefenacin 175 µg once daily via a standard jet nebulizer or tiotropium once daily via HandiHaler ® for 28 days [ 17 , 21 ]. On day 29, revefenacin and tiotropium effectively improved trough FEV 1 and FVC from baseline, with improvements numerically favouring revefenacin over tiotropium; however, these differences did not reach statistical significance (FEV 1 : p = 0.481; FVC: p = 0.104).…”
Section: Scientific Summarymentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…In a randomized, double-blind phase IIIb study (NCT03095456), 207 patients with moderate to very severe COPD and suboptimal PIFR (< 60 L/min) were randomized to receive revefenacin 175 µg once daily via a standard jet nebulizer or tiotropium once daily via HandiHaler ® for 28 days [ 17 , 21 ]. On day 29, revefenacin and tiotropium effectively improved trough FEV 1 and FVC from baseline, with improvements numerically favouring revefenacin over tiotropium; however, these differences did not reach statistical significance (FEV 1 : p = 0.481; FVC: p = 0.104).…”
Section: Scientific Summarymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In a prespecified subgroup analysis, revefenacin significantly ( p ≤ 0.0407) improved trough FEV 1 and FVC from baseline compared with tiotropium in patients with severe to very severe COPD (i.e. FEV 1 < 50% of predicted), which accounted for ≈ 80% of enrolled patients [ 17 , 21 ].…”
Section: Scientific Summarymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The In-Check DIAL (Clement Clerke International Ltd.) has been used widely in studies to measure PIFRr (46, 8, 9). It is portable and provides an adjustable dial to simulate different DPI resistances.…”
Section: Analytic Validationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…These wide ranges reflect measurements with different DPI resistances in different COPD populations. Two randomized controlled trials demonstrated that patients with severe to very severe COPD and a suboptimal PIFRr against the Diskus had greater improvements in lung function with a bronchodilator delivered by nebulization compared with a DPI (8, 9).…”
Section: Clinical Validationmentioning
confidence: 99%