2022
DOI: 10.1016/j.softx.2022.101238
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

TAFFO: The compiler-based precision tuner

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
3
2
1

Relationship

2
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 22 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Our solution for precision tuning with GPGPUs exploits the well-established taffo framework [3,6]. The five pipeline stages of the taffo architecture are called Initializer (init), Value Range Analysis (vra) Data Type Allocation (dta), Conversion (conv), and Feedback Estimator (fe).…”
Section: Methodology For Gpgpu Precision Tuningmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Our solution for precision tuning with GPGPUs exploits the well-established taffo framework [3,6]. The five pipeline stages of the taffo architecture are called Initializer (init), Value Range Analysis (vra) Data Type Allocation (dta), Conversion (conv), and Feedback Estimator (fe).…”
Section: Methodology For Gpgpu Precision Tuningmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Very few tools discussed currently in the literature satisfy these points. TAFFO [4] is a precision tuning tool implemented as a plugin for LLVM compiler framework. It works with programs written in C/C++ and compiles them into transprecision binaries trading off accuracy of result for the execution time.…”
Section: Precision Tuning Support At Compiler Levelmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A precision tuning compiler, therefore, needs such information either from the programmer (by means of compiler hints expressed as annotations or pragmas) or from profiling (as in profile-guided optimization [18]). Our set of plugins for the LLVM compiler framework, TAFFO [4], takes the former approach, leveraging programmer annotations that express the value ranges of the input data. Figure 3 shows the TAFFO compiler pipeline, compared with the standard compilation flow performed by the LLVM.…”
Section: Precision Tuning Compiler: Architecturementioning
confidence: 99%