2015
DOI: 10.1016/j.jart.2015.10.002
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

TADS: An assessment methodology for agile supply chains

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
30
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
9
1

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 24 publications
(30 citation statements)
references
References 14 publications
0
30
0
Order By: Relevance
“…It is evident that initially researchers [5,17,[28][29][30][31][32][33] evaluated supply chain performance statistically by integrating the questionnaire data and subjective approach, and rank performance enablers of supply chain that are collected from different business professionals. Subsequently, others [34][35][36][37][38][39][40][41] suggested to integrate multiple criterions related to production, market, people, and information to evaluate the performance of supply chain. For example, researchers used the technique of preference by similarity index multi-criteria approach [42][43][44][45][46][47][48], generalized trapezoidal approach [44,45], data envelopment analysis [46,47], set theory [9,24], agent based modelling [9], and quality-function deployment [49].…”
Section: Supply Chain Sustainable Agility Evaluation: a Brief Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It is evident that initially researchers [5,17,[28][29][30][31][32][33] evaluated supply chain performance statistically by integrating the questionnaire data and subjective approach, and rank performance enablers of supply chain that are collected from different business professionals. Subsequently, others [34][35][36][37][38][39][40][41] suggested to integrate multiple criterions related to production, market, people, and information to evaluate the performance of supply chain. For example, researchers used the technique of preference by similarity index multi-criteria approach [42][43][44][45][46][47][48], generalized trapezoidal approach [44,45], data envelopment analysis [46,47], set theory [9,24], agent based modelling [9], and quality-function deployment [49].…”
Section: Supply Chain Sustainable Agility Evaluation: a Brief Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As a result, they not only determined closed-form optimal cycle time and number of shipments for the problem, but also achieved expected goals and revealed quite a few merits of this particular FPR system as compared to prior works [9][10]. Studies relating to fabrication systems with various aspects of quality improvements, multi-delivery plan, and rotation cycle time issues can also be referred to [11][12][13][14][15][16][17][18][19][20]. Grubbstrom and Erdem [21] presented a simplified approach, to solve the economic order quantity model with backordering without using derivatives.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Current paper claims that such an adoption of new and complex methodologies is not enough to maintain and develop competitiveness and satisfaction of clients' interests and is merely a first step into this direction. Moreover, when trying to please the customers' unique needs, an organization is required to take a step forward and integrate concepts such as agility, high-quality and speed of delivery, alongside with an agile mindset that would allow increase in competitive advantage in such turbulent times [1].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%