“…Then, on both the full and downsampled bulk Hi-C data, scKTLD was compared with the other seven TAD callers, including deTOKI, deDoc, scHiCluster, TopDom, SpectralTAD, GRiNCH, and Higashi. It is worth noting that among these methods, deTOKI, scHiCluster, and Higashi are devoted to the identification of TAD-like domains on single-cell Hi-C data, while the remaining four are designed for bulk Hi-C data and are reported to be applicable to lower sequencing depths ( Cresswell et al 2020 , Lee and Roy 2021 , Liu et al 2022 ). This comparison was conducted in the following three ways: Firstly, similarity between the TADs was called for on bulk Hi-C data before and after downsampling.…”