1981
DOI: 10.1177/0145482x8107500904
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Tactual Maps: Discriminability of Textures and Shapes

Abstract: Report of a study of the discriminability of point symbols in tactual maps which showed that the three shapes and four textures tested are distinguishable in sizes 7.9 mm (.3 in.) and larger. Suggestions for the use of textures in tactual maps are offered.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

1994
1994
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
3
1
1

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 8 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 6 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Figure 1 presents an example of the displays. Symbols were 8 by 8 millimeters (.315 inch by .315 inch), except for the ellipse, which was 5.5 by 11 millimeters (.216 by .433 inch), which is a size at which symbols have been shown to be readily identifiable and discriminable (Horsfall & Vanston, 1981). The width of the line was 1.3 millimeters (.05 inch), and the height was nominally 340 micrometers (.0134 inch).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Figure 1 presents an example of the displays. Symbols were 8 by 8 millimeters (.315 inch by .315 inch), except for the ellipse, which was 5.5 by 11 millimeters (.216 by .433 inch), which is a size at which symbols have been shown to be readily identifiable and discriminable (Horsfall & Vanston, 1981). The width of the line was 1.3 millimeters (.05 inch), and the height was nominally 340 micrometers (.0134 inch).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%