2023
DOI: 10.1109/tbme.2022.3201241
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Tactile Sensation Assisted Motor Imagery Training for Enhanced BCI Performance: A Randomized Controlled Study

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
6
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
1
1

Relationship

2
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 11 publications
(15 citation statements)
references
References 46 publications
0
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…We suppose that somatosensory mental images are easier to perform and the learning of tactile imagery is more regulated and understandable compared to motor imagery, thus TIbased BCIs could be more useful and lower barriers to entry compared to MI-BCIs. There are a lot of studies showing the usefulness of tactile feedback and tactile stimulation during motor imagery training and MI-BCI control [69][70][71]. We believe that the positive effect of TS on the learning on kinesthetic imagination of movements may be associated with the use of mental tactile sensations (i.e.…”
Section: Tactile Imagery Perspectivesmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…We suppose that somatosensory mental images are easier to perform and the learning of tactile imagery is more regulated and understandable compared to motor imagery, thus TIbased BCIs could be more useful and lower barriers to entry compared to MI-BCIs. There are a lot of studies showing the usefulness of tactile feedback and tactile stimulation during motor imagery training and MI-BCI control [69][70][71]. We believe that the positive effect of TS on the learning on kinesthetic imagination of movements may be associated with the use of mental tactile sensations (i.e.…”
Section: Tactile Imagery Perspectivesmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…Additionally, our approach is methodologically different from other tactile BCIs that utilize ERPs (mainly P300) for control, since we employed equal probability of target and distractor stimulus occurrence. This approach is different from classical oddball paradigm employed in other tactile ERP BCIs where the target (deviant, odd) stimuli is less frequent than the standard, and different from studies employing several targets of the same, smaller, probability compared to distractor stimuli (Guger et al, 2017;Spataro et al, 2018;Yao et al, 2022;Zhong et al, 2023). Guger et al (2017) and Spataro et al (2018) in one of their paradigms utilized vibrotactile stimulation on left/right wrists (targets) and distractor on the shoulder or back in order to induce P300 responses.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Several works have also shown that it can improve the accuracy of motor attempt/imagination when performing BCI experiments. Notable examples are the studies presented in Yao et al ( 2017 ), Shu et al ( 2018 ), Yao et al ( 2018b ), and Zhong et al ( 2022 ), showing the advantage of including tactile sensation concurrent to the performance of motor tasks.…”
Section: Design Of Brain-based Neural Interfaces For Motor Rehabilita...mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Thus, rehabilitation schemes that involve multisensory feedback might have the potential to improve current outcomes. Examples of those are systems combining robot-driven actuations and electric or magnetic stimulation, immersive visual and auditory feedback by, e.g., embedding the training in a virtual world, or tactile stimulation (Hu et al, 2015 ; Resqúın et al, 2016 ; Straudi et al, 2016 ; Nam et al, 2017 ; Zhong et al, 2022 ).…”
Section: Design Of Brain-based Neural Interfaces For Motor Rehabilita...mentioning
confidence: 99%