1980
DOI: 10.3758/bf03204299
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Tactile retention: Reading with the skin

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

1
17
0

Year Published

1987
1987
2013
2013

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 21 publications
(18 citation statements)
references
References 18 publications
1
17
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Passive touch , where the observer makes no voluntary movements, may promote subjective experiences. Thus it seemed plausible that passivity may impair memory for sequentially presented tactile input (Heller, 1980) . However, the results of the present study suggest that passive tactile retention need not always be deficient, if optimal conditions for presentation are used .…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…Passive touch , where the observer makes no voluntary movements, may promote subjective experiences. Thus it seemed plausible that passivity may impair memory for sequentially presented tactile input (Heller, 1980) . However, the results of the present study suggest that passive tactile retention need not always be deficient, if optimal conditions for presentation are used .…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, the results of the present study suggest that passive tactile retention need not always be deficient, if optimal conditions for presentation are used . It may be necessary to limit the range of stimuli (for POP), make this known to the subjects, and allow observers the use of two hands (see Craig, 1985;Heller, 1980Heller, , 1986b. Haptics may differ from passively generated tactile information in a couple of important ways .…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…However, the participants' performance remained higher than chance even in the articulatory suppression condition. The authors thus suggested that additional encoding strategies may have been involved, and in particular, they suggested that participants use spatial imagery (for the link between touch and imagery, see also Heller, 1980;Warren & Rossano, 1991), which has been shown to be immune to concurrent articulatory suppression (see, e.g., Logie, 1986). To investigate this proposal, the authors used a diagrammatic representation of the hand (Mahrer & Miles, 2002, Exp.3) and showed that seeing the second sequence presented either to the hand or on a diagrammatic representation of a hand improved recognition, as compared with a condition in which the second sequence was only presented in the tactile modality.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%