2020
DOI: 10.1038/s41598-020-72890-y
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Tactile perception of randomly rough surfaces

Abstract: Most everyday surfaces are randomly rough and self-similar on sufficiently small scales. We investigated the tactile perception of randomly rough surfaces using 3D-printed samples, where the topographic structure and the statistical properties of scale-dependent roughness were varied independently. We found that the tactile perception of similarity between surfaces was dominated by the statistical micro-scale roughness rather than by their topographic resemblance. Participants were able to notice differences i… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

1
18
0
1

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
1
1

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 22 publications
(20 citation statements)
references
References 47 publications
(71 reference statements)
1
18
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…For example, a group of tribology researchers 3D printed surface textures with random topography, and their stimuli were very similar to ours. Their recent paper reported a low discrimination ability in human observers (45), which is also consistent with our results and theory.…”
Section: Relationship With Roughness Perceptionsupporting
confidence: 93%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…For example, a group of tribology researchers 3D printed surface textures with random topography, and their stimuli were very similar to ours. Their recent paper reported a low discrimination ability in human observers (45), which is also consistent with our results and theory.…”
Section: Relationship With Roughness Perceptionsupporting
confidence: 93%
“…With these stimuli, it is not easy to examine the contribution of higher-order surface statistics separately from those of lower-order ones. To overcome this limitation, we rendered complex haptic stimuli using a high-resolution 3D printer, as done by a few recent tactile studies (e.g., (44)(45)(46)). By printing the surface of a sample material with the 3D printer, we transcribed complex texture patterns into carving patterns of tangible surface (Fig.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Surface roughness and texture are two essential attributes influencing haptic impression and thus judgment of material composition, slipperiness, and comfort. [31,32] A rough surface can be described by a multitude of independent parameters emphasizing different characteristics related to amplitude and spatial distribution of the height profile. In many applications, surface roughness is described only as the arithmetical mean height S a or the root mean square height S q .…”
Section: Haptic Surface Impressionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For the dynamic touch, the accepted threshold for the detection of the feature is in the micron range [ 12 ]. Sahli et al [ 14 ] highlight that the tactile perception of similarity between surfaces is governed by the statistical microscale roughness rather than by their topographic resemblance, in contrast with the visual perception, which is dominated by the surface height topographic resemblance.…”
Section: Introduction and Backgroundmentioning
confidence: 99%