2005
DOI: 10.2219/rtriqr.46.40
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Tactile Ground Surface Indicator Widening and its Effect on Users' Detection Abilities

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2010
2010
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
4
1
1

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 3 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…& In a review of tactile paving, the guidance (DfT, 2007b) would benefit from more emphasis being placed on the 'dos and don'ts' of tonal contrast, especially given that most people with a vision impairment have some residual vision so tonal contrast and the use of correct colours is hugely important for these pedestrians. & Research by others (Fujinami et al, 2005;Jansson et al, 2007) has shown that a smooth surface around the tactile paving will impact on the detectability of the tactile paving. The DfT (2007b) guidance suggests a 150 mm minimum contrasting border where there is insufficient tonal contrast.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 96%
“…& In a review of tactile paving, the guidance (DfT, 2007b) would benefit from more emphasis being placed on the 'dos and don'ts' of tonal contrast, especially given that most people with a vision impairment have some residual vision so tonal contrast and the use of correct colours is hugely important for these pedestrians. & Research by others (Fujinami et al, 2005;Jansson et al, 2007) has shown that a smooth surface around the tactile paving will impact on the detectability of the tactile paving. The DfT (2007b) guidance suggests a 150 mm minimum contrasting border where there is insufficient tonal contrast.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 96%
“…Fujiyama et al ( 2005) 13 evaluated the wide of tactile ground surface indicators and its effects on users' detection abilities. Thirty-four participants with visual impairment used with the can feel the road.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…To address this issue, a warning surface is installed at the edge of the ramp to provide a sensible contrast with the adjacent walking area. Different countries, including Sweden, the UK, the U.S.A., and Japan have considered using warning systems that rely on tactile and visual contrast ( 1 , 3 – 5 ). Truncated dome detectable warning surface (DWS) has proved to be easy to detect by most vision-impaired pedestrians either by foot or a cane ( 6 ).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%