2009
DOI: 10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2009.03.014
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Tactile acuity in the blind: A closer look reveals superiority over the sighted in some but not all cutaneous tasks

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

4
75
1

Year Published

2010
2010
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 108 publications
(85 citation statements)
references
References 44 publications
4
75
1
Order By: Relevance
“…3). These results are in agreement with previous studies comparing blind and sighted participants on the fingers (Stevens et al, 1996;Van Boven et al, 2000;Kanics, 2003, 2006; but see Grant et al, 2000;Alary et al, 2009) and lips (Stevens et al, 1996).…”
Section: Evidence That Tactile Experience Drives Acuity Enhancementsupporting
confidence: 93%
“…3). These results are in agreement with previous studies comparing blind and sighted participants on the fingers (Stevens et al, 1996;Van Boven et al, 2000;Kanics, 2003, 2006; but see Grant et al, 2000;Alary et al, 2009) and lips (Stevens et al, 1996).…”
Section: Evidence That Tactile Experience Drives Acuity Enhancementsupporting
confidence: 93%
“…4). Our finding of superior tactile acuity in the blind, while similar to the findings of Goldreich and Kanics and Van Boven et al, differs from the results of Grant et al (2000) and Alary et al (2009). This difference in outcome is perhaps surprising, because all five of these studies evaluated tactile acuity using a grating orientation discrimination task.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 81%
“…When tactile acuity has been measured using grating orientation discrimination, once again the findings have been contradictory: Some studies have found superior discrimination performance for the blind (e.g., Goldreich & Kanics, 2003;Van Boven et al, 2000), while others (e.g., Alary et al, 2009;Grant et al, 2000) have found no difference in performance between their sighted and blind participants. At the moment, it is unclear whether blind adults truly possess enhanced tactile acuity relative to otherwise similar sighted adults.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Beyond Braille reading and Braille related tactile stimuli, a number of studies have also provided evidence of superior behavioral performance in the blind compared to sighted peers. This includes 3D shape discrimination (Norman and Bartholomew 2011), tactile acuity assessed by grating orientation discrimination (Norman and Bartholomew 2011), as well as using a 2D angle discrimination task (Alary, Duquette et al 2009) and virbrotactile perception (Wan, Wood et al 2010). Furthermore, it has been found that unlike their sighted counterparts, blind Braille readers retain high tactile acuity (measured with specially designed tactile acuity charts requiring active tactile exploration) without an age-related decline (Legge, Madison et al 2008).…”
Section: 0 Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%