2008
DOI: 10.1021/ma800881r
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Tacticity Effects on the Phase Diagram for Poly(N-isopropylacrylamide) in Water

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

9
90
0
1

Year Published

2012
2012
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
4
3

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 76 publications
(100 citation statements)
references
References 18 publications
9
90
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…The T c of the aqueous solution of PNdEAm increases with increasing m content as reported previously [10]. The tacticity dependence of T c for PNEAm, on the other hand, is similar to that observed for PNiPAm [12], which is opposite to that for PNdEAm. These results indicate that an isotactic-rich PNdEAm is hydrophilic, whereas an isotactic-rich PNEAm is hydrophobic.…”
Section: Introductionsupporting
confidence: 86%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…The T c of the aqueous solution of PNdEAm increases with increasing m content as reported previously [10]. The tacticity dependence of T c for PNEAm, on the other hand, is similar to that observed for PNiPAm [12], which is opposite to that for PNdEAm. These results indicate that an isotactic-rich PNdEAm is hydrophilic, whereas an isotactic-rich PNEAm is hydrophobic.…”
Section: Introductionsupporting
confidence: 86%
“…The co-solvent effect on the phase behaviour of PNiPAm is different from that of PNdEAm; the addition of methanol to the aqueous solutions causes the rise of the cloud point (T c ) for PNdEAm [7], but the decrease of T c for PNiPAm [8]. The tacticity dependence of T c is also opposite for these two polymers: The increase of the meso diad (m) fraction in the polymer chain causes the rise of T c for PNdEAm [9,10], but the decrease of T c for PNiPAm [11,12]. These phenomena cannot be explained only by taking account of the interaction between the side chain and water, and thus we have to also consider the contribution of the intramolecular interaction among the side chains [13].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…r was in the range 53 % (no Y(OTf) 3 ) to 12 % (0.266 M Y(OTf) 3 ). Katsumoto et al [284] prepared poly(DEAm)s with differing tacticity by RAFT polymerization in the presence of Y(OTf) 3 or Sc(OTf) 3 .…”
Section: Control Of Stereochemistry In Raft Polymerizationmentioning
confidence: 99%