2012
DOI: 10.21236/ada560710
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Tactical Nuclear Weapons and NATO

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2013
2013
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7
1
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 13 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…54 In the words of one observer, 'US alliance relations in Asia as a whole developed in a considerably more hierarchical fashion, arranged in a hub-and-spoke model in which Washington dealt bilaterally and from a position of strength with each allied government rather than collectively through a single multilateral alliance'. 55 However, over the past decade, the USA has also conducted bilateral consultations with Australia, Japan and South Korea, based on these allies' desire to gain more insight into and influence in US nuclear weapons-related policy. 56 Plans have also been made to extend such consultations to a trilateral (Japan, South Korea and the USA) or a quadrilateral (as for trilateral but including Australia) format.…”
Section: Consultation and Planningmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…54 In the words of one observer, 'US alliance relations in Asia as a whole developed in a considerably more hierarchical fashion, arranged in a hub-and-spoke model in which Washington dealt bilaterally and from a position of strength with each allied government rather than collectively through a single multilateral alliance'. 55 However, over the past decade, the USA has also conducted bilateral consultations with Australia, Japan and South Korea, based on these allies' desire to gain more insight into and influence in US nuclear weapons-related policy. 56 Plans have also been made to extend such consultations to a trilateral (Japan, South Korea and the USA) or a quadrilateral (as for trilateral but including Australia) format.…”
Section: Consultation and Planningmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…55 However, over the past decade, the USA has also conducted bilateral consultations with Australia, Japan and South Korea, based on these allies' desire to gain more insight into and influence in US nuclear weapons-related policy. 56 Plans have also been made to extend such consultations to a trilateral (Japan, South Korea and the USA) or a quadrilateral (as for trilateral but including Australia) format. 57 One forum for bilateral nuclear consultation is the US-Japan Extended Deterrence Dialogue, which was established in 2010.…”
Section: Consultation and Planningmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…4–5). The United States even deployed a huge number of nuclear weapons to its allies in Europe and Asia to make them “nuclear porcupines” during the Cold War era (Nichols et al, 2012, p. 23). The United States withdrew most nuclear weapons except about 100 in Europe.…”
Section: Nuclear Strategies For Small Nuclear Statesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Furthermore, the smuggling of such weapons (encased in engineered shielding material) onto U.S. soil is a very real threat, and such warheads could cause massive harm if detonated in an urban area. Tactical nuclear weapons, highly destructive yet portable warheads that can be easily transported around an environment make up most of the nuclear arsenal that has ever been produced [47]. Dirty bombs built from radioactive sources [2], radioactive emanation from stolen medical or industrial-use isotopes [50], or health risks from a malfunctioning nuclear power plant [3] are other frightening but very real threat scenarios with recent precedents.…”
Section: Nuclear Threat Detection Domainmentioning
confidence: 99%