Tactical decision making under stress: History and overview.

Collyer, Stanley C.; Malecki, Gerald S.

doi:10.1037/10278-016

Cited by 34 publications

(25 citation statements)

References 6 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…Team cognition plays an important role in team performance or effectiveness and in the effectiveness of many sociotechnical systems (Cooke, Gorman, & Winner, 2007). There are several notable examples of catastrophic system failures that are tied to breakdowns in team cognition, such as the 1988 shooting down of an Iranian Airbus full of passengers by the USS Vincennes (Collyer & Malecki, 1998), the events leading to the Challenger shuttle disaster (Vaughan, 1996), and the untimely response to Hurricane Katrina (Leonard & Howitt, 2006). Each of these examples can be, at least partially, attributed to deficits in team cognition as evidenced in faulty or limited team interactions.…”

Section: The Importance Of Understanding Team Cognitionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Interactive Team Cognition

et al. 2012

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Cognition in work teams has been predominantly understood and explained in terms of shared cognition with a focus on the similarity of static knowledge structures across individual team members. Inspired by the current zeitgeist in cognitive science, as well as by empirical data and pragmatic concerns, we offer an alternative theory of team cognition. Interactive Team Cognition (ITC) theory posits that (1) team cognition is an activity, not a property or a product; (2) team cognition should be measured and studied at the team level; and (3) team cognition is inextricably tied to context. There are implications of ITC for theory building, modeling, measurement, and applications that make teams more effective performers.

show abstract

Section: The Importance Of Understanding Team Cognitionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Interactive Team Cognition

et al. 2012

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…Further, counterexamples of incidents featuring poor decisions made based on incorrect knowledge do exist (e.g. the USS Vincennes, Iranian Airbus incident; Collyer and Makecki 1998). However, because implicit learning touches on the central role of experience in shaping cognitive systems, the study of implicit learning in virtual learning environments may be important.…”

Section: 2mentioning

confidence: 98%

Adopting the instructional science paradigm to encompass training in virtual environments

Dorsey¹,

Campbell

Russell³

2009

Theoretical Issues in Ergonomics Science

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

The science of instruction and training is founded on decades of research and practice. Moreover, the field continues to evolve as new theories, methods and practices emerge. A modern driver for this evolution has been the development of a vast array of instructional technologies. One of the newer technological advances is the use of virtual environments. This article considers how fundamental theories and findings from educational and training psychology may or may not apply in the world of virtual environments. In addition, apparent gaps are highlighted in the current knowledge base in order to foster ideas for future research.

show abstract

“…1 Three widely cited examples are the partial core meltdown at the Three Mile Island nuclear plant (Wickens 1992), the Exxon Valdez oil spill in Alaska's Prince William Sound, the worst oil spill in US history (Salas et al 1996) and the accidental targeting and destruction of an Iranian airbus by the USS Vincennes (Collyer and Malecki 1998). Individual and team cognition have been tested at high levels of many kinds of stressors during the responses to such crises as the September 11, 2001, attacks on the World Trade Center and the 2005 Hurricane Katrina.…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Effects of mood and stress on distributed team cognition

Pfaff

McNeese

2010

Theoretical Issues in Ergonomics Science

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Team cognition under stress has come under increasing scrutiny, most often in the wake of unfortunate and catastrophic accidents. The role of mood in team cognition, however, has attracted markedly less attention. An exploration of laboratory research on the effects of mood and stress on cognition at the individual level reveals convergent and overlapping findings suggesting that mood plays a more significant role in team cognition than is currently acknowledged. This article proposes a theoretical approach for distinguishing between the impacts of moods and stressors upon team cognition. It is demonstrated that team experiments conducted using this approach can reveal compelling patterns in this complex research space and identify both mediators and moderators in the process. This framework provides further insights into team cognition under stress that point towards design recommendations for systems and procedures used in technologically complex work environments.

show abstract

Tactical decision making under stress: History and overview.

Abstract: NOV2 61991 REPRODUCED FROM BEST AVAILABLE COPY Appnovo for pub'k rv(~jo-dltth'bution in un-mtd,

Cited by 34 publications

References 6 publications

Interactive Team Cognition

Interactive Team Cognition

Adopting the instructional science paradigm to encompass training in virtual environments

Effects of mood and stress on distributed team cognition

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About