Tackling the sustainability iceberg

Meinlschmidt, Jan; Schleper, Martin C.; Foerstl, Kai

doi:10.1108/ijopm-03-2017-0141

Cited by 92 publications

(50 citation statements)

References 69 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…We adopt RDT to guide the analytical iteration process between theory and data (Meinlschmidt, Schleper, & Foerstl, 2018). This process required us to 'travel back and forth' between our empirical findings and theory (Miles & Huberman, 1994;Strauss & Corbin, 1990).…”

Section: Abductive Theorizing: Elaborating On Rdtmentioning

confidence: 99%

Maximising “Community Benefits” in public procurement: tensions and trade-offs

Wontner

Walker

Harris

et al. 2020

IJOPM

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

PurposeThis study aims to illuminate the challenges involved in implementing community benefits (CBs), a sustainable public procurement policy that ensures that there are positive social and economic outcomes for the local community when public money is spent on goods, works and services.Design/methodology/approachInterviews and focus groups were conducted with public sector buyers and suppliers in Wales with experience in implementing CBs. Resource dependence theory was used to examine the extent to which dependence on resources effects CBs implementation.FindingsWhilst the study confirms that implementation of CBs improves economic and social outcomes, there can also be challenges for public sector organisations and their constituent supply chains. These include tensions between CBs and other policies, differing views between buyers and suppliers, and the unintended consequences of promoting one form of CBs over another.Research limitations/implicationsThe research found that Welsh Government influences the buyer-supplier dyad through regulatory and financial power. We elaborate on resource dependency theory by adding four constructs (powerful stakeholders, intra and inter organisational issues, challenges and enablers) to better understand the flows of power and resources in this research context.Practical implicationsBuyer and supplier practitioners and policymakers may find the factors leading to successful CBs implementation useful, such as ensuring closer communication and liaison at early contract stages.Social implicationsCommunity benefits are aimed at improving socioeconomic issues through public procurement.Originality/valueThis study addresses the need for research into how public sector organisations and suppliers seek to implement socio-economic sustainability measures, and the lack of research on CBs implementation to date. It is also novel in adopting a dyadic approach and a resource dependency perspective.

show abstract

Section: Abductive Theorizing: Elaborating On Rdtmentioning

confidence: 99%

Maximising “Community Benefits” in public procurement: tensions and trade-offs

Wontner

Walker

Harris

et al. 2020

IJOPM

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…(e.g. Meinlschmidt et al, 2018;Pakdeechoho and Sukhotu, 2018) and also strategic alliances (e.g. Liu et al, 2020;Meinlschmidt et al, 2018).…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Enhancing sustainable supply chain management performance through alliance portfolio diversity: the mediating effect of sustainability collaboration

Nguyen

Cheng

2021

IJOPM

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

PurposeWhile strategic alliances is a concept increasingly discussed in the field of sustainable supply chain management (SSCM), an emerging and more crucial concept regarding alliances—namely, the alliance portfolio—is mostly ignored in the SSCM context. Mainly drawing on the categorisation–elaboration model (CEM), this research develops a three-layer model to explore the effects of three alliance portfolio diversity facets on the three triple-bottom-line SSCM performances through the mediation of sustainability collaboration.Design/methodology/approachThe field data are collected from 321 Vietnamese manufacturers. Scale accuracy is assessed through the confirmatory factor analysis method. Hierarchical linear regressions are applied to test the proposed model and hypotheses.FindingsPartner, governance, and functional alliance portfolio diversities have a U-shaped, inverted U-shaped, and positive linear effect, respectively, on sustainability collaboration. Sustainability collaboration is in turn found to enhance the SSCM performances in terms of economic, environmental, and social.Originality/valueThis research introduced a new theoretical lens, CEM, to the SSCM field. It also provided findings that can help firms to manage their alliance portfolios more dynamically in terms of the nature and diversity level of the portfolio and in a way that adds to the triple bottom line through the mediating effect of sustainability collaboration.

show abstract

“…In order to assess transaction costs, some researchers have identified their contents with opportunity costs (see e.g., Bigelow et al 2019;Jouan et al 2019). Other methodological problems include transaction costs, such as loss of reputation, loss of trust in a supplier, and others that are difficult to express in monetary terms (see e.g., Meinlschmidt et al 2018;Pesch and Ishmaev 2019).…”

Section: Transaction Costs Of Actors Of Reorganized Universitiesmentioning

confidence: 99%

Leadership and Effective Institutional Economics Design in the Context of Education Reforms

et al. 2020

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Nowadays, the most typical reforms in higher education are conducted through the reorganization of universities either in the form of a merger, acquisition, or new status attainment. As a result, universities which educate local leaders for their respective national economies and have a profound impact on the regional economic development, as well as the composition of the labor market and intellectual potential, often encounter negative economic outcomes. The reforms that are imposed by the policymakers “from above” often hamper the development of universities and prevent them from fulfilling their roles described above. The process of reforming higher education in Russia is in many ways similar to the changes in the higher education systems of other European countries, in particular in post-Communist transition economies. Firstly, this process went through the integration into the global market of educational services. Secondly, it proceeded with the rethinking of the role of the university as a self-sustainable business organization. Thirdly, it was concluded by an increase in the demand and accessibility of education using the advancements offered by the digital technologies. Our paper argues that focused and well-balanced economic institutional design might be required for the sustainable development of reorganized leading universities. The project perspective implies that it is necessary to develop an institutional design in relation to what the organization seeks to achieve (either as its regulator or reformer) and how it intends to achieve these goals. In connection with the foregoing, we propose the following principles of designing effective institutions for the sustainable development of reorganized universities: (i) preservation of education as a “mixed” good (i.e., one that has the features of both public and private goods); (ii) transparency of decision making; (iii) complementarity of institutional change; and last but not least (iv) reduction in transaction costs.

show abstract

Tackling the sustainability iceberg

Cited by 92 publications

References 69 publications

Maximising “Community Benefits” in public procurement: tensions and trade-offs

Maximising “Community Benefits” in public procurement: tensions and trade-offs

Enhancing sustainable supply chain management performance through alliance portfolio diversity: the mediating effect of sustainability collaboration

Leadership and Effective Institutional Economics Design in the Context of Education Reforms

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About