2022
DOI: 10.1038/s42254-022-00532-5
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Tackling the subsampling problem to infer collective properties from limited data

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
8
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
2
1

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 17 publications
(9 citation statements)
references
References 147 publications
0
8
0
Order By: Relevance
“…We performed avalanche analysis on the model population activity, as we did for the experiments. We analyzed the dynamics of a subset of only 200 units, neglecting the rest, to account for subsampling effects that are certainly present in our experiments and may be important for assessing critical dynamics (65)(66)(67). We note that our primary results are robust to different degrees of subsampling (fig.…”
Section: Theory Of Critical Dynamics Confirms Experimental Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We performed avalanche analysis on the model population activity, as we did for the experiments. We analyzed the dynamics of a subset of only 200 units, neglecting the rest, to account for subsampling effects that are certainly present in our experiments and may be important for assessing critical dynamics (65)(66)(67). We note that our primary results are robust to different degrees of subsampling (fig.…”
Section: Theory Of Critical Dynamics Confirms Experimental Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Limited sampling poses a challenge when trying to access properties of various complex dynamical systems [46,47]. Furthermore, undersampling may introduce systematic bias to observations that need to be corrected [48][49][50]. This can happen, for example, when assessing collective properties, like graph structures in a network or activity clusters spanning large fractions of the system.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“… 16 for a complete derivation of the method. Furthermore, we were still required to decrease the system’s variables and thus calculated the measure across repeated stochastic subsamples ( 68 ) of the neuronal activity ( ) into 169 neurons repeated 100 times, and the mean is presented. Briefly, , where I is the mutual information , with the entropy of the past states and the conditional entropy of the past states given the current state has about its past—at a time lag of τ = 1 ms, and (disconnected I ) is the mismatched information that cannot be partitioned into independent parts.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%