Our system is currently under heavy load due to increased usage. We're actively working on upgrades to improve performance. Thank you for your patience.
2016
DOI: 10.1002/wcs.1383
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Tackling the ‘dyslexia paradox’: reading brain and behavior for early markers of developmental dyslexia

Abstract: Developmental dyslexia is an unexplained inability to acquire accurate or fluent reading that affects approximately 5–17% of children. Dyslexia is associated with structural and functional alterations in various brain regions that support reading. Neuroimaging studies in infants and pre-reading children suggest that these alterations predate reading instruction and reading failure, supporting the hypothesis that variant function in dyslexia susceptibility genes lead to atypical neural migration and/or axonal g… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

1
138
0
10

Year Published

2016
2016
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
7
1
1

Relationship

3
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 152 publications
(160 citation statements)
references
References 181 publications
(219 reference statements)
1
138
0
10
Order By: Relevance
“…A confluence of genetic and environmental influences interact reciprocally to affect children's reading development (Ozernov‐Palchik, Yu, Wang, & Gaab, ). Hereditary risk is a strong predictor of reading disability, as approximately 40–60% of children who have a parent who is reading‐disabled will have reading problems themselves (Gilger, Hanebuth, Smith, & Pennington, ; Snowling, Gallagher, & Frith, ).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A confluence of genetic and environmental influences interact reciprocally to affect children's reading development (Ozernov‐Palchik, Yu, Wang, & Gaab, ). Hereditary risk is a strong predictor of reading disability, as approximately 40–60% of children who have a parent who is reading‐disabled will have reading problems themselves (Gilger, Hanebuth, Smith, & Pennington, ; Snowling, Gallagher, & Frith, ).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Although an increasing number of studies take a network and/or a multivariate pattern analytical approach in identifying differences in dyslexia [e.g., 2], here, we deliberately take a modular perspective and focus on the location of neurobiological anomalies related to dyslexia in order to link findings with etiological theories of dyslexia. We therefore do not include electrophysiological studies, which have higher temporal resolution but typically have lower spatial resolution [for an overview of other behavioral and electroencephalography (EEG) studies see 3,4]. …”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The specific case of dyslexia demonstrates the critical role of several key EF in reading development (speed of processing, working memory and visual attention), all of which were found to be impaired in children with dyslexia (41) (42). Therefore, reports of the positive effect of EF training (43) or even video games exposure (44) on reading abilities are not surprising and may be the key for intervention or even prevention for children who are at genetic risk for developing reading difficulties, as also has been suggested by Ozrenov-Palchik and Gaab (45). In his multivariate model for dyslexia, Pennington strengthens the tight relationship between phonological processing deficits and additional cognitive alterations (i.e.…”
Section: When Things Go Wrongmentioning
confidence: 71%