2013
DOI: 10.1016/j.csi.2012.08.001
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Tackling redundancy in text summarization through different levels of language analysis

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5
2
1
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 23 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 13 publications
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The text summarization can be understood by Fig. 1 where the input represents a large amount of data and the output is condensed useful information [1][3] [17]. Text summarization is employed in various elds such as in research, in document retrieval, in smart handling of technology etc.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The text summarization can be understood by Fig. 1 where the input represents a large amount of data and the output is condensed useful information [1][3] [17]. Text summarization is employed in various elds such as in research, in document retrieval, in smart handling of technology etc.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…They use a greedy algorithm (Wan et al (2007), Zhang et al (2005)) to impose a diversity penalty on the sentences. Lloret and Palomar (2013) have used three different levels of language analysis to tackle redundancy in text summarization. Different levels of language analysis are: lexical, syntactic and semantic.…”
Section: Machine Learning Techniques Applied Inmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…While extractive methods tend to have better performance on the first two aspects, they are typically less coherent and more redundant than abstractive ones, where new sentences are often generated by sentence fusion and compression, which helps detecting and removing redundancy (Lebanoff et al, 2019). Although eliminating redundancy has been initially and more intensely studied in the field of multidocument summarization (Lloret and Sanz, 2013), because important sentences selected from multiple documents (about the same topic) are more likely to be redundant than sentences from the same document, generating a non-redundant summary should still be one of the goals for single document summarization (Lin et al, 2009).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%