Tackling Marginalisation through Social Innovation? Examining the EU Social Innovation Policy Agenda from a Capabilities Perspective

Abstract

This paper demonstrates that the capabilities approach offers a number of conceptual and evaluative benefits for understanding social innovation and -in particular, its capacity to tackle marginalisation. Focusing on the substantive freedoms and achieved functionings of individuals introduces a multidimensional, plural appreciation of disadvantage, but also of the strategies to overcome it. In light of this, and the institutional embeddedness of marginalisation, effective social innovation capable of tackling marginalisation depends on a) the participation of marginalized individuals in b) a process that addresses the social structuration of their disadvantage. In spite of the high-level ideals endorsed by the European Union, social innovation tends to be supported through EU policy instruments as a means towards the maintenance of prevailing institutions, networks and cognitive ends. This belies the transformative potential of social innovation emphasised in EU policy documentation and neglects the social structuration processes from which social needs and societal challenges arise. One strategy of displacing institutional dominance is to incorporate groups marginalised from multiple institutional and cognitive centres into the policy design and implementation process. This incorporates multiple value sets into the policymaking process to promote social innovation that is grounded in the doings and beings that all individuals have reason to value.

Social Innovation to Sustain Rural Communities: Overcoming Institutional Challenges in Serbia

“…In policy discourse, social innovations have been presented as a solution to many kinds of old and new social challenges at a time when there is growing economic pressure on public administrations [10,11]. Social innovations are seen as an opportunity to support social wellbeing [12,13], tackle marginalisation [14], and trigger transformative changes through collective action [15].…”

Innovation and societal transformation – what changes when the ‘social’ comes in?

“…Scholars are trying to play their part in investigating and informing effective action on these grand challenges of our times (Howard-Grenville et al 2019). Across geographic contexts and fields of activity, social innovation moves into the centre of attention across the social sciences as an effective response to these challenges (Anheier, Krlev, & Mildenberger, 2019;George et al 2019;Howaldt et al 2019;Jacobi, Edmiston, and Ziegler 2017;Rao-Nicholson, Vorley, and Khan 2017). Current examples of social innovation range from new employment models built on a special ability image of disability (Hockerts 2015), to decentralised renewable energy production (Huybrechts and Haugh 2017), to new forms of contracting social service provision, such as social impact bonds (Edmiston and Nicholls 2017).…”

Emancipatory Indigenous social innovation: Shifting power through culture and technology

“…This is important for understanding the role of social innovation in achieving social change as these sources of power, and their dynamic interplay, determine the relative agency of individuals, communities, and populations. These dynamics also structure the disadvantage and marginalisation that cause these populations to be underserved by markets and/or prevent access to resources (von Jacobi, Edmiston, & Ziegler, 2017). Furthermore, power relations and societal structures are inherently resistant to change, particularly when coupled with the entrenched interests of powerful actors, thereby setting the very agenda of the 'social' in social innovation as a particularly challenging form of innovation (Newth & Woods, 2014).…”