Revolutions have powerful effects on the way the past is presented and perceived. In former communist states of Eastern Europe, following the revolutions establishing the regimes, a further sudden inversion has been regularly experienced in the aftermath of the fall of the Eastern Bloc. In this paper, I will comparatively discuss these changes through the lens of Albania. The discussion will highlight how the first communist revolution of the 1940s changed the way the Albanian state looked at its heritage and how this perspective was again completely transformed in the aftermath of the 1991. In both cases the perception of the periods immediately preceding the revolutionary events were those mostly affected. In particular, as regards the second revolution, in Albania, as in many other cases, after a long silence, the perspective adopted by the main stakeholders in the new democratic order was to characterise the heritage of communism in terms of trauma and terror. While these aspects undoubtedly encapsulate key features, there is more to processes of memory and heritage making related to this period. Private memories can sometimes produce rather different narratives of the same recent past, creating a clash with the representation put forward by the state. Iacono is an archaeologist and heritage specialist and has been involved in research projects in Albania, Greece and Italy. His research interests are quite broad and range in scope from cultural heritage of communism to Mediterranean archaeology, social theory (in particular Marxism), and history of archaeological thought. His current Marie Slodowska Curie project is entitled Cultural Heritage of Dictatorship in Albania (CHODIA) and focuses on the recent (from the communist dictatorship period) cultural heritage of this country and its perception in contemporary society.