1960
DOI: 10.1001/jama.1960.03020070016005
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Tables of Average Weight and Height of Americans Aged 65 to 94 Years

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
53
1

Year Published

1962
1962
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
9
1

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 144 publications
(56 citation statements)
references
References 3 publications
2
53
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Nutritional assessment included body weight and height measurement. Percentage average body weight was then calculated by dividing the patient's body weight by the corresponding age-and sex-specific average body weight [11] and multiplying this ratio by 100. Triceps skin-fold thickness and mid-arm circumference were measured in the right arm midway between the tip of the acromion and the olecranon using a Holtain skin-fold caliper which has a pressure of 10 g/ mm of contact surface area over its entire operating range.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Nutritional assessment included body weight and height measurement. Percentage average body weight was then calculated by dividing the patient's body weight by the corresponding age-and sex-specific average body weight [11] and multiplying this ratio by 100. Triceps skin-fold thickness and mid-arm circumference were measured in the right arm midway between the tip of the acromion and the olecranon using a Holtain skin-fold caliper which has a pressure of 10 g/ mm of contact surface area over its entire operating range.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Standardized techniques were used to collect: triceps and subscapular skinfolds, knee height, weight, mid-arm, wrist and calf circumferences; comparisons were made to accepted references (Master et al, 1960;Frisancho, 1990;Gibson, 1990;Hopkins, 1993). For the geriatric clinic sample, all measures were completed by the research dietitian, excepting weight and height measured at the geriatrician's clinic.…”
Section: Study 1-construct Validationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Examining cross-sectional data, Holmgren (1952) came to the paradoxical conclusion that males increased 3.5 cm between the ages of 26 and 70, while females increased 1.3 cm between age 26 and 50 but then declined 1 cm from 50 to 70. Master, Lasser and Beckman (1960) measured older adults between the ages of 65 and 94 in whole inches and found no difference in height with age. Because crosssectional data can be confounded with secular change and selection bias related to age, however, these results are difficult to interpret.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 96%