1952
DOI: 10.1016/s0022-3476(52)80205-7
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Tables for predicting adult height from skeletal age: Revised for use with the greulich-pyle hand standards

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

7
495
0
18

Year Published

1964
1964
2012
2012

Publication Types

Select...
10

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 1,069 publications
(537 citation statements)
references
References 4 publications
7
495
0
18
Order By: Relevance
“…The remaining boys were followed to completion of puberty. We considered their PFHt at Tanner stage 5 as their FHt, since by that time, their BA was 15.5 -16 years, at which point the PFHt is accurate in both boys with a normal growth pattern as well as short boys, either SGA or AGA, with early or delayed puberty (23,26).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The remaining boys were followed to completion of puberty. We considered their PFHt at Tanner stage 5 as their FHt, since by that time, their BA was 15.5 -16 years, at which point the PFHt is accurate in both boys with a normal growth pattern as well as short boys, either SGA or AGA, with early or delayed puberty (23,26).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…11 The predicted height was calculated using the Bayley-Pinneau method. 17 Thyroid function tests were monitored yearly in all subjects and replacement with levothyroxine was instituted if the thyroid stimulating hormone (TSH) level was elevated above institutional norms. Gonadal function studies (plasma luteinizing hormone (LH) and follicle stimulating hormone (FSH) levels, plasma-estradiol levels in girls and testosterone levels in boys) were performed in all patients starting at age 10 years.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Body mass index (BMI) was calculated as weight (in kg) divided by the square of height (in m). Bone age was determined in each participating center according to the Greulich± Pyle standards (16). Relative bone age retardation was calculated as bone age minus chronological age divided by chronological age.…”
Section: Patientsmentioning
confidence: 99%