Search citation statements
Paper Sections
Citation Types
Year Published
Publication Types
Relationship
Authors
Journals
The use of the spheroid of revolution as representative of the figure of the Earth rests on the assumption of a regular distribution of matter. The fact that there is an irregular distribution is patent to everyone—there are hills, valleys, plains, mountains, and oceans. But underneath this visible irregularity there is a concealed regularity that the theory of isostasy tries to represent. According to this theory, or rather according to the Pratt‐Hayford formulation of it, if we go down into the Earth a certain distance, 60 to 120 km, upon every unit‐area of a certain size there‐stands an approximately equal amount of matter regardless of whether the surface be valley, plain, hill, mountain, or ocean. The Airy formulation of isostasy reaches the same approximate equality of superincumbent matter by another conception, which may be called the “roots‐of‐the‐mountains” theory. The theory of isostasy in one form or another represents approximately the conditions over a large portion of the land‐surface of the Earth and probably over a large portion of the oceanic surface. If this were not so, the theory would never have been accepted as it is. It was foreshadowed by Bouguer and Cavendish in the 18th century but was not explicitly formulated until the middle of the 19th century, when Pratt and Airy at about the same time put forward their various conceptions as to the equilibrium of the Earth's crust. The name itself was given by Dutton [see 1 of “References” at end of paper] in 1889.
The use of the spheroid of revolution as representative of the figure of the Earth rests on the assumption of a regular distribution of matter. The fact that there is an irregular distribution is patent to everyone—there are hills, valleys, plains, mountains, and oceans. But underneath this visible irregularity there is a concealed regularity that the theory of isostasy tries to represent. According to this theory, or rather according to the Pratt‐Hayford formulation of it, if we go down into the Earth a certain distance, 60 to 120 km, upon every unit‐area of a certain size there‐stands an approximately equal amount of matter regardless of whether the surface be valley, plain, hill, mountain, or ocean. The Airy formulation of isostasy reaches the same approximate equality of superincumbent matter by another conception, which may be called the “roots‐of‐the‐mountains” theory. The theory of isostasy in one form or another represents approximately the conditions over a large portion of the land‐surface of the Earth and probably over a large portion of the oceanic surface. If this were not so, the theory would never have been accepted as it is. It was foreshadowed by Bouguer and Cavendish in the 18th century but was not explicitly formulated until the middle of the 19th century, when Pratt and Airy at about the same time put forward their various conceptions as to the equilibrium of the Earth's crust. The name itself was given by Dutton [see 1 of “References” at end of paper] in 1889.
On the basis of the gravity material available, the author studies two statistical functions: G2 = the rms (root mean square) anomaly in a square with side s, and E2 = the rms deviation of one actual point anomaly from the actual mean anomaly in a square with side s. The function E2, is called the error of representation, for if inside a square there is only one observed anomaly and this anomaly is accepted to represent the mean anomaly of the entire square, a standard mean error E can be used for the estimation of accuracy. On the other hand, if there are no observations inside the square and the mean anomaly of the square is assumed to be zero, G can be used as the standard mean error. For points or for very small squares, E is zero and G has a maximum value G0. For a hemisphere, G is zero and E has a maximum value G0. There is a critical size at about s = 3°, where E = G. When s is greater, it is not advisable to use the observed anomaly at a single station, as the representative of the mean anomaly of the square, because for zero the error to be expected is smaller. The weighted mean of zero and the observed anomaly is recommended. Because the regions without any observations are still large, it is necessary to estimate the size of the smallest squares, where the mean anomaly can be assumed to be independent of the mean anomalies of the adjacent squares. On the basis of the present gravity data, an estimated value of s = 30° seems to be acceptable. Using the functions E and G and the accepted values s = 3° and s = 30°, the precision obtainable for the gravimetric determination of the elevations N of the geoid (Stokes' formula) and of the deflections δ of the vertical (Vening Meinesz' formula) has been estimated. In the most favorable cases (Central Europe and the central parts of the United States) the standard mean error of N is ±10 meters and that of δ ± 0.″85. The former figure is almost entirely due to the great unexplored areas of the Earth'; the latter depends half on these unexplored areas and half on the small gaps within a distance of 50° from the point where δ is computed.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.
customersupport@researchsolutions.com
10624 S. Eastern Ave., Ste. A-614
Henderson, NV 89052, USA
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.
Copyright © 2024 scite LLC. All rights reserved.
Made with 💙 for researchers
Part of the Research Solutions Family.