2006
DOI: 10.1007/s10032-006-0017-x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Table-processing paradigms: a research survey

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
80
0
1

Year Published

2006
2006
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
3
2
1

Relationship

2
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 129 publications
(81 citation statements)
references
References 45 publications
0
80
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…5 TISP correctly discarded all uses of tables for layout and successfully paired all sibling tables. There were no nested tables in this domain.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…5 TISP correctly discarded all uses of tables for layout and successfully paired all sibling tables. There were no nested tables in this domain.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We use a conceptual-modeling language to model both the input tables and the output interpretations as suggested in [5]. When we do, the Figure 1 as an example, Table 4 has three Row s, starting with Identification, Location, and Function.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…An issue that keeps recurring in our on-going surveys of table recognition [1,3,4] is what should be the output of a table interpretation program. Specific output formats differ widely, but many are equivalent to a spreadsheet where cell contents can be addressed by coordinates.…”
Section: Commercial Softwarementioning
confidence: 99%
“…After describing our view of low-level table processing, we will suggest that this step can now be circumvented by judicious us of common "office" software. 1 The inter-conversion between tables in HTML, PDF, XLM, XLS and DOC files is demonstrated. We then discuss possible table representations for bridging the semantic gap that has so far kept table recognition from being incorporated into routine information retrieval and data extraction applications.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%