1992
DOI: 10.1525/aeq.1992.23.3.05x1124f
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Table Hopping in the Cafeteria: An Exploration of "Racial" Integration in Early Adolescent Social Groups

Abstract: This study, based on qualitative and quantitative methods, concludes that loose-knit peer groups encourage interracial interaction, whereas cliques do not. The conceptual significance of loose-knit groups is that they are midway in intimacy between the classroom and cliques, and thus an important intermediate stage in the progression of "race" relations. A practical implication is that knitness is a useful indicator of the effects of the formal organization on voluntary race relations. ADOLESCENCE, INTEGRATION… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
14
0
1

Year Published

1996
1996
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 15 publications
(16 citation statements)
references
References 9 publications
(11 reference statements)
0
14
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Such food was often specific to an ethnic group and, therefore, was a concrete representation of children's ethnic identity. In addition, cliques based on race and ethnicity begin to form during early adolescence (Zisman & Wilson, 1992). Given that biethnic adolescents are usually the extreme minority in a given context, where do these adolescents fit within these cliques, and how does this impact their ethnic identity formation?…”
Section: Promoting/inhibiting Environmentsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Such food was often specific to an ethnic group and, therefore, was a concrete representation of children's ethnic identity. In addition, cliques based on race and ethnicity begin to form during early adolescence (Zisman & Wilson, 1992). Given that biethnic adolescents are usually the extreme minority in a given context, where do these adolescents fit within these cliques, and how does this impact their ethnic identity formation?…”
Section: Promoting/inhibiting Environmentsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…There is room for action by the individual to influence his or her proximity to others. Proximity may result from a desire to be noticed by others and invited to join a group (Bder, 1985), the perception of shared interests or behaviors (e.g., Kandel, 1978), or the desire to 'test' a relationship with someone (Eder, 1985;Zisman & Wilson, 1992). Based upon observations in a middle school cafeteria, Eder (1985) observed that students who were new to the school frequently changed seats as they explored the pool of potential friends.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Students who had been at the school for at least one year were more stable in their seating arrangement. Similarly, a study of 'table hopping' reported that the open atmosphere in the school cafeteria provided a safe environment for youth to cross the racial boundaries to test out friendships (Zisman & Wilson, 1992). When students are not able to avoid proximity to other students, Eder (1985) observed the use of symbolic means to distinguish themselves from others (e.g., ignoring friendly initiations).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Epstein (1983) reports that students tend to prefer peers who are more similar to themselves in gender, ethnicity, age, and grade in school. Race and gender were found to be important grouping criteria in determining seating patterns in school cafeterias in that there was a general preference to associate with in-group members (Schofield & Sagar, 1977;Zisman & Wilson, 1992). These findings have also emerged from observations in task-oriented settings where there is more cross-race interaction (Schofield & Francis, 1982).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 79%