2015
DOI: 10.5392/ijoc.2015.11.4.077
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Table Detection from Document Image using Vertical Arrangement of Text Blocks

Abstract: Table detection is a challenging problem and plays an important role in document layout analysis. In this paper, we propose an effective method to identify the table region from document images. First, the regions of interest (ROIs) are recognized as the table candidates. In each ROI, we locate text components and extract text blocks. After that, we check all text blocks to determine if they are arranged horizontally or vertically and compare the height of each text block with the average height. If the text b… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
19
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
5
3

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 60 publications
(21 citation statements)
references
References 10 publications
0
19
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In these cases, the classification loss introduced with the Inception-based classifiers significantly helped in improving the corresponding accuracy scores. To ground our work with state of the art in table detection, we compared the performance of the four different configurations of our method to those achieved by DeepDeSRT [59], Tran [34] and Hao [27] in detecting only tables on the ICDAR 2013 dataset. The comparison is reported in Table IV and highlights the importance of the different components of our method.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In these cases, the classification loss introduced with the Inception-based classifiers significantly helped in improving the corresponding accuracy scores. To ground our work with state of the art in table detection, we compared the performance of the four different configurations of our method to those achieved by DeepDeSRT [59], Tran [34] and Hao [27] in detecting only tables on the ICDAR 2013 dataset. The comparison is reported in Table IV and highlights the importance of the different components of our method.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…To increase the efficiency of the non-text-analysis approach, a number of improvements have been proposed such as those of [1,13,17,38]. In [13], the authors propose a Box Driven Reasoning (BDR), allows one to robustly analyze the structure of table form documents that include touching characters and broken lines.…”
Section: Non-text-analysis Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The method of Kasar et al [17] is a learning approach that allows one to detect table regions in document images by identifying the column and row line separators as well as their properties. In [38], Tran et al propose a method to identify the table region from document images that requires the existence of table-structure lines or table-structure boundaries. The proposed method proceeds as follows.…”
Section: Non-text-analysis Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…At present, most research on table recognition is aimed at scanned documents. Table features, such as text blocks [11,12], word spacing [13,14], column spacing [15], junctions [16], and ruling lines [17] are used to detect tables in scanned document images. All the above methods assume that the text lines and table boundaries are parallel, but they are not parallel in intelligent IoT vision device-captured images due to perspective transformation [18,19].…”
Section: Table-recognition Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%