Tabata training: one of the most energetically effective high-intensity intermittent training methods

Tabata, Izumi

doi:10.1007/s12576-019-00676-7

Cited by 83 publications

(105 citation statements)

References 66 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Unclassified

Order By: Relevance

“…Interestingly, at the initially suggested intensity of 170% V•O 2MAX (Tabata et al, 1996), most of the athletes and non-athletes were unable to complete the 7-8 sprints. This aspect was previously questioned (Viana et al, 2018c), and these incompatibilities are possibly due to the differences between the tests used to obtain the training loads (Tabata, 2019), which put some light in this debatable point from the findings of the present investigation. While Tabata et al (1996) used an obsolete, unpractical and questionable protocol that requires a large number of 10-min visits to the laboratory (Bangsbo, 1992;Medbo et al, 1988), Viana et al (2018c) we used the traditional, worldwide-used, and very practical maximal graded exercise test (Buchheit & Laursen, 2013b).…”

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 60%

“…Previously, on a treadmill, other studies demonstrated that for 30s:15s training in active young men and 15s:15s in middle-aged runners, the intensities of 110%vV•O 2MAX and100%vV•O 2MAX , respectively, presented the higher oxygen consumption (Aguiar et al, 2013;Billat et al, 2001). Otherwise, subjects maintained the V•O 2 closed to 90-95% of the V•O 2MAX , which is lower than the 100% reached in the original study and questioned the author's statement that the 'Tabata training' should be considered as ''one of the most energetically effective exercise training protocols for maximally improving both the aerobic and anaerobic energy-supplying systems'' (Tabata, 2019).…”

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 86%

“…One of the most popular HIIE structure (Tabata, 2019) was proposed by Tabata et al, (1996), which is also one of the most inconsistently applied protocols (Gentil et al, 2016). It is seven to eight repetitions of 20 s of effort and 10 s of passive recovery (20s:10s) performed until the participant was unable to keep at least 85 rpm.…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…Regarding energetic responses, the authors claimed that the 20s:10s protocol reached maximal aerobic and anaerobic demands (Tabata, 2019;Tabata et al, 1996). This statement was because, at the end of the protocol, the subjects reached their maximal accumulated oxygen deficit (MAOD) and an oxygen uptake equal to their V•O 2MAX .…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

See 3 more Smart Citations

Physiological aspects and energetic contribution in 20s:10s high-intensity interval exercise at different intensities

Protzen

Bartel

Coswig

et al. 2020

PeerJ

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Background One of the most popular high-intensity interval exercises is the called “Tabata Protocol”. However, most investigations have limitations in describing the work intensity, and this fact appears to be due to the protocol unfeasibility. Furthermore, the physiological demands and energetic contribution during this kind of exercise remain unclear. Methods Eight physically active students (21.8 ± 3.7 years) and eight well-trained cycling athletes (27.8 ± 6.4 years) were enrolled. In the first visit, we collected descriptive data and the peak power output (PPO). On the next three visits, in random order, participants performed interval training with the same time structure (effort:rest 20s:10s) but using different intensities (115%, 130%, and 170% of PPO). We collected the number of sprints, power output, oxygen consumption, blood lactate, and heart rate. Results The analysis of variance for multivariate test (number of sprints, power output, blood lactate, peak heart rate and percentage of maximal heart rate) showed significant differences between groups (F = 9.62; p = 0.001) and intensities (F = 384.05; p < 0.001), with no interactions (F = 0.94; p = 0.57). All three energetic contributions and intensities were different between protocols. The higher contribution was aerobic, followed by alactic and lactic. The aerobic contribution was higher at 115%PPO, while the alactic system showed higher contribution at 130%PPO. In conclusion, the aerobic system was predominant in the three exercise protocols, and we observed a higher contribution at lower intensities.

show abstract

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 60%

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 86%

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

See 2 more Smart Citations

Physiological aspects and energetic contribution in 20s:10s high-intensity interval exercise at different intensities

Protzen

Bartel

Coswig

et al. 2020

PeerJ

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…One of the most popular HIIE structure (Tabata 2019) was proposed by Tabata et al (Tabata et al 1996), which is also one of the most inconsistently applied protocols (Gentil et al 2016). It is 7 to 8 repetitions of 20 seconds of effort and 10 seconds of passive recovery (20s:10s) performed until the participant was unable to keep at least 85 rpm.…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Peer Review #1 of "Physiological aspects and energetic contribution in 20s:10s high-intensity interval exercise at different intensities (v0.1)"

2020

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Background. One of the most popular High-Intensity Interval Exercises is the called "Tabata Protocol". However, most investigations have limitations in describing the work intensity, and this fact appears to be due to the protocol unfeasibility. Furthermore, the physiological demands and energetic contribution during this kind of exercise remain unclear. Methods. Eight physically active students (21.8 ± 3.7 years) and eight well-trained cycling athletes (27.8 ± 6.4 years) were enrolled. In the first visit, we collected descriptive data and the peak power output (PPO). On the next three visits, in random order, participants performed interval training with the same time structure (effort:rest 20s:10s) but using different intensities (115%, 130%, and 170% of PPO). We collected the number of sprints, power output, oxygen consumption, blood lactate, and heart rate. Results. The analysis of variance for multivariate test (number of sprints, power output, blood lactate, peak heart rate and percentage of maximal heart rate) showed significant differences between groups (F=9.62; p=0.001) and intensities (F=384.05; p<0.001), with no interactions (F=0.94; p=0.57). All three energetic contributions and intensities were different between protocols. The higher contribution was aerobic, followed by alactic and lactic. The aerobic contribution was higher at 115%PPO, while the alactic system showed higher contribution at 130%PPO. In conclusion, the aerobic system was predominant in the three exercise protocols, and we observed a higher contribution at lower intensities.

show abstract

High-Intensity Interval Training Protocols Variation Response to Immune Parameters and Cardiovascular Risk Factors: A Scoping Review

Zaid,

Muhamad,

Jawis

et al. 2023

Lecture Notes in Bioengineering

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Tabata training: one of the most energetically effective high-intensity intermittent training methods

Cited by 83 publications

References 66 publications

Physiological aspects and energetic contribution in 20s:10s high-intensity interval exercise at different intensities

Physiological aspects and energetic contribution in 20s:10s high-intensity interval exercise at different intensities

Peer Review #1 of "Physiological aspects and energetic contribution in 20s:10s high-intensity interval exercise at different intensities (v0.1)"

High-Intensity Interval Training Protocols Variation Response to Immune Parameters and Cardiovascular Risk Factors: A Scoping Review

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About