2017
DOI: 10.1128/jcm.00510-17
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

T2 Magnetic Resonance Assay-Based Direct Detection of Three Lyme Disease-Related Borrelia Species in Whole-Blood Samples

Abstract: In early Lyme disease (LD), serologic testing is insensitive and seroreactivity may reflect active or past infection. In this study, we evaluated a novel assay for the direct detection of three species of Borrelia spirochetes in whole blood. The T2 magnetic resonance (T2MR) assay platform was used to amplify Borrelia DNA released from intact spirochetes and to detect amplicon. Analytical sensitivity was determined from blood spiked with known concentrations of spirochetes, and the assay's limit of detection wa… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
4
1
1

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 9 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 31 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Recently, T2 magnetic resonance assay was evaluated to detect Candida spp. and some bacteria in whole blood (Mylonakis et al, 2015 ; Snyder et al, 2017 ; Peker et al, 2018 ). In the present study, we evaluated the Magicplex TM Sepsis test (MP), comparing it with conventional BC.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Recently, T2 magnetic resonance assay was evaluated to detect Candida spp. and some bacteria in whole blood (Mylonakis et al, 2015 ; Snyder et al, 2017 ; Peker et al, 2018 ). In the present study, we evaluated the Magicplex TM Sepsis test (MP), comparing it with conventional BC.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It appears possible to detect B. burgdorferi in the blood with higher sensitivity [27] in early Lyme disease. In addition, there are a variety of PCR-based assays in development that use unconventional signal detection or amplification methods [27,28], with the potential to achieve a limit of detection (LOD) that is substantially lower than with standard PCR methods.…”
Section: Detection Of Dna: Nucleic Acid Amplification Testsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…can often be detected using culture or polymerase chain reaction (PCR) of skin biopsies taken from EM lesions [4], this approach is impractical for routine use. Blood PCR has not been very useful; the sensitivity of whole-blood or plasma PCR in patients with EM is usually in the 30%-50% range [5][6][7][8][9], and blood PCR is seldom positive in patients with later manifestations of LB [10]. Similarly, cerebrospinal fluid PCR is poorly sensitive in patients with Lyme neuroborreliosis [11,12], leaving PCR analysis of joint fluid/synovial tissue from patients with suspected Lyme arthritis as the only clinically useful PCR application.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%