2010
DOI: 10.1299/jsmemecjo.2010.8.0_165
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

T0201-3-6 Observation of microscopic deformation in the porcine thoracic aortic wall during circumferential stretch

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

3
2
0

Year Published

2013
2013
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
3

Relationship

1
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
3
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…As for the circumferential EL waviness obtained at the selected cases (n = 19), the average value, W = 1.082 ± 0.038 (mean ± SD), agreed with the measured values reported in a previous study (Uno et al, 2010), indicating that the range of initial prestresses assigned for EL in this study was comparably reasonable. Notably, the residual stresses of EL and SML obtained at the unloaded state were compressive and tensile, respectively, and quantitatively equivalent to the values estimated by the prior works, i.e., ±10 kPa (Breslavsky and Amabili, 2018;Liu et al, 2019;Matsumoto et al, 2004a and2004b).…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 89%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…As for the circumferential EL waviness obtained at the selected cases (n = 19), the average value, W = 1.082 ± 0.038 (mean ± SD), agreed with the measured values reported in a previous study (Uno et al, 2010), indicating that the range of initial prestresses assigned for EL in this study was comparably reasonable. Notably, the residual stresses of EL and SML obtained at the unloaded state were compressive and tensile, respectively, and quantitatively equivalent to the values estimated by the prior works, i.e., ±10 kPa (Breslavsky and Amabili, 2018;Liu et al, 2019;Matsumoto et al, 2004a and2004b).…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 89%
“…As we aimed to identify the specific mechanical parameters to computationally reconstruct both the circumferential EL waviness and the waviness of EL ridge, we excluded the cases in which the longitudinal EL undulation was not clearly observed (n = 45), and a further investigation was conducted for the remaining cases (n = 19) with W = 1.082 ± 0.038 (mean ± SD) on average. Notably, most of the selected circumferential EL waviness (n = 19) fell within the range of reasonable values, 1.05-1.15, which was experimentally observed in vitro for the medial strips from the porcine aortas (Uno et al, 2010). Figure 6 demonstrates the normal X-stress distribution in the unit structure obtained at the initial and unloaded states.…”
Section: Circumferential El Wavinesssupporting
confidence: 59%
“…This was also predicted by Yamada et al (1999) who conducted a layer-structured FE analysis of arteries by modeling active (SML) and passive (EL and collagen fibers) elements separately. Compared to experimental results obtained with micro-and macroscopic observations on an aortic medial strip subjected to uniaxial stretch (Uno et al, 2010), WEL = 1.11 we obtained (Fig. 10a) is reasonable in the in vitro unloaded state.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 85%
“…10a) is reasonable in the in vitro unloaded state. The aim of our additional series of simulations was to identify a specific contribution of collagen fibers that would make it possible for the computationally model-predicted WEL- relationship to match the one experimentally obtained by Uno et al (2010), most of which was within the range of WEL = 1.05-1.15 in vitro ( = 0%). They reported that EL waviness vanished at ~20% strain, which is equivalent to our simulation results.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The specimen was stretched with a uniaxial tensile tester which was originally made in our laboratory. (9) Briefly, two ends of a specimen were glued on two separate lever arms, which were mounted on a linear guide with an oppositely threaded screw driven by a stepping motor. The lever arms moved to opposite direction to each other with this guide to keep the center part of the specimen inside the field of view.…”
Section: Uniaxial Tensile Testermentioning
confidence: 99%