2019
DOI: 10.1016/j.tafmec.2019.102381
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

T-strain effects in kinked interfacial fracture of bonded composites

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 19 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 72 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In quasibrittle materials such as rocks, the critical distance r c,V is large when compared to the specimen size and, therefore, on many occasions, classical fracture criteria like SV-MTS, which takes into account only the singular terms of stress field, cannot predict accurately the fracture load of rock notched samples. In such cases, it has been suggested in previous studies that higher order terms in the stress field could be taken into consideration [28][29][30][31][32][33][34] or, alternatively, the stress or strain components could be determined directly from FEM analyses. The MTS-FEM approach, utilized recently for predicting the fracture behavior of rock notched samples [22,[35][36][37], corresponds to the second approach.…”
Section: Analytical Approach: Mixed-mode Fracture Criterionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In quasibrittle materials such as rocks, the critical distance r c,V is large when compared to the specimen size and, therefore, on many occasions, classical fracture criteria like SV-MTS, which takes into account only the singular terms of stress field, cannot predict accurately the fracture load of rock notched samples. In such cases, it has been suggested in previous studies that higher order terms in the stress field could be taken into consideration [28][29][30][31][32][33][34] or, alternatively, the stress or strain components could be determined directly from FEM analyses. The MTS-FEM approach, utilized recently for predicting the fracture behavior of rock notched samples [22,[35][36][37], corresponds to the second approach.…”
Section: Analytical Approach: Mixed-mode Fracture Criterionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Then, given the boundary conditions and the calculated macroscopic stiffness tensor, the stress field coefficients K I , K II , and T are obtained numerically for the homogenized domain in every increment of the crack growth. In the current work, these coefficients are computed using the finite element overdeterministic (FEOD) approach which has been used widely in the past by Mirsayar and co-workers 44,57,[59][60][61][62][63][64] and other researcher [65][66][67] for various material systems, loading conditions, and specimen geometries. Finally, the crack propagation angle and onset of mixed-mode fracture can be predicted using the O-MPS criterion in every increment for any specimen geometry and loading conditions.…”
Section: Homogenized Orthotropic Fracture Criterionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…14 One of the approaches to improve the predictions of these classical criteria is use of higher order terms especially T-stress for characterizing the stress or strain component around the crack tip. [15][16][17][18][19][20][21][22] On the other hand, there are various test laboratory-size samples suggested in the literature for assessing the mixed mode fracture behavior of rocks. [23][24][25][26][27][28] The onset of fracture in the real rock structure which are often very large is predicted usually according to results obtained from these laboratory-size samples.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%