2019
DOI: 10.1016/j.measurement.2018.09.037
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

T-SAW methodology for parametric evaluation of surface integrity aspects in AlMg3 (AA5754) alloy: Comparison with T-TOPSIS methodology

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
12
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5
3

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 15 publications
(12 citation statements)
references
References 46 publications
0
12
0
Order By: Relevance
“…They have investigated the ranking of optimization of composite materials by the evaluation of different option and leading to most appropriate one. The most criteria used was Fuzzy-TOPSIS, VIKOR, AHP, GRA, DL, MDL, PSI, T-SAW, COPRAS ELECTRE, MOORA-fuzzy [5][6][7][8][9][10][11][12][13][14]. Dewangan et al [10] applied Fuzzy-TOPSIS based MCDM approach for the optimization of parametric contribution of EDM process parameters on surface integrity and dimensional accuracy of tool material.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…They have investigated the ranking of optimization of composite materials by the evaluation of different option and leading to most appropriate one. The most criteria used was Fuzzy-TOPSIS, VIKOR, AHP, GRA, DL, MDL, PSI, T-SAW, COPRAS ELECTRE, MOORA-fuzzy [5][6][7][8][9][10][11][12][13][14]. Dewangan et al [10] applied Fuzzy-TOPSIS based MCDM approach for the optimization of parametric contribution of EDM process parameters on surface integrity and dimensional accuracy of tool material.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This was further compared with bivariate and multivariate statistical analysis as well as data mining approaches in assessing water mapping based on the GIS. Sahu et al [31] developed the Taguchi SAW method to rank the cutting speed, feed, and depth of cut in a lathe machine. Then, the Taguchi TOPSIS method was employed to validate the rankings in their research.…”
Section: Hybrid Mcdm Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, limited literature has been found applying these techniques in combination with the DOE approach. When multiple responses are obtained, the implementation of (MCDM) methods are suitable in order to convert the multiple-response optimization problem into a single response optimization problem [60]. Among the methods most often applied in combination with the Taguchi DOE approach are the GRA and TOPSIS methods [50,61].…”
Section: Multi-criteria Decision-making Analysis (Mcdma)mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Among the methods most often applied in combination with the Taguchi DOE approach are the GRA and TOPSIS methods [50,61]. The combination of these robust techniques have been applied mainly in machining processing and manufacturing sector areas, mainly [60,[62][63][64]. However, in road construction, few research studies have been done.…”
Section: Multi-criteria Decision-making Analysis (Mcdma)mentioning
confidence: 99%