“…One can see from Table 1 that the results provided by Theorem 1 à coincide with those obtained from [16], where Theorem 1 à denotes Theorem 1 with P 41 ¼ P 31 , P 42 ¼ P 32 , P 43 ¼ 0 and P 44 ¼ P 33 ; the results are obtained from Theorem 1 in this paper are better than those in [3,6,10,16,17,25] with relatively less demand of computation burden, and some improvements over [10] Table 2 gives the results of the two controller designs under the lower delay bound d 1 ¼ 1: one is based on the method given by [5], and the other is based on Theorem 3 of this paper. It can be seen from Table 2 that the results provided in this paper are less conservative than those by [5]. Moreover, to show the effectiveness of the obtained results, the membership function is assumed to be l 1 ¼ ð1 À 1=ð1 þ expðÀ6x 2 ðkÞ À 1:5pÞÞÞ Â ð1 þ 1=ð1þ expðÀ6x 2 ðkÞ À 1:5pÞÞÞ, l 2 ¼ 1 À l 1 , and let the scenario where the input delay changes randomly in the range 1 dðkÞ 10.…”