2005
DOI: 10.1016/j.imlet.2005.01.009
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

T helper (h)1/Th2 and : paradox rather than paradigm

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2

Citation Types

4
150
1
6

Year Published

2006
2006
2015
2015

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 203 publications
(161 citation statements)
references
References 76 publications
(79 reference statements)
4
150
1
6
Order By: Relevance
“…The Th1/Th2 paradigm to intracellular infection is largely based on investigations using L. major and the roles of IL-12 and IL-4 in driving Th1 and Th2 cell development for resistance and susceptibility respectively are well established [26]. Since previous studies correlated high levels of IL-4 with increased arginase activities and increased parasite burden in L. majorinfected BALB/c mice [16], we aimed to study the status of host arginase in L. donovani-infected mice and the cellular mechanism underlying its modulation.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The Th1/Th2 paradigm to intracellular infection is largely based on investigations using L. major and the roles of IL-12 and IL-4 in driving Th1 and Th2 cell development for resistance and susceptibility respectively are well established [26]. Since previous studies correlated high levels of IL-4 with increased arginase activities and increased parasite burden in L. majorinfected BALB/c mice [16], we aimed to study the status of host arginase in L. donovani-infected mice and the cellular mechanism underlying its modulation.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A report also suggests that arginase is involved in L. infantum parasite survival in the host and the failure to control the progression of splenic infection in mice may be related to the actions of IL-10 attenuating the cytotoxic response via NO downregulation [25]. Pathogenesis and failure to check the proliferation of the intracellular parasites in leishmaniasis has been ascribed to polarized Th2 response [25], but the precise mechanism resulting in the inability to control disease progression is not very well documented.The Th1/Th2 paradigm to intracellular infection is largely based on investigations using L. major and the roles of IL-12 and IL-4 in driving Th1 and Th2 cell development for resistance and susceptibility respectively are well established [26]. Since previous studies correlated high levels of IL-4 with increased arginase activities and increased parasite burden in L. majorinfected BALB/c mice [16], we aimed to study the status of host arginase in L. donovani-infected mice and the cellular mechanism underlying its modulation.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…+ and CD8 + T cells, and regulatory T (Treg) cells, are involved in the control of leishmaniasis (5)(6)(7). These studies have also indicated that a fine balance between effector and regulatory immune responses may be required for the efficient control of Leishmania without extensive collateral tissue damage (8).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The explanation for this difference between visceral leishmaniasis cases with the classical versus asymptomatic forms may lie in the type of host cellular immune response 27 . Another hypothesis is that genetic factors are involved in development of the clinical disease.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%