2013
DOI: 10.1158/2326-6066.cir-13-0006
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

T Cells Expressing Chimeric Antigen Receptors Can Cause Anaphylaxis in Humans

Abstract: T cells can be redirected to overcome tolerance to cancer by engineering with integrating vectors to express a chimeric antigen receptor (CAR). In preclinical models, we have previously demonstrated that transfection of T cells with messenger RNA (mRNA) coding for a CAR is an alternative strategy that has antitumor efficacy and the potential to evaluate the on-target off-tumor toxicity of new CAR targets safely due to transient mRNA CAR expression. Here, we report the safety observed in four patients treated w… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

4
383
0
4

Year Published

2014
2014
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
7
2
1

Relationship

2
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 481 publications
(391 citation statements)
references
References 24 publications
(29 reference statements)
4
383
0
4
Order By: Relevance
“…For instance, the development of anti-CAR immune responses in metastatic renal cell cancer patients treated with a murine anti-CAIX CAR was analyzed in detail, and it was postulated that T cell function and persistence may have been negatively impacted by this effect (Lamers et al, 2011). Most concerning, it was recently reported that repeated administration of murine CAR-engineered T cells led to development of antimouse antibody responses, associated with anaphylaxis and cardiac arrest in one subject (Maus et al, 2013). The use of a human antibody such as Ha1-4.117 instead of mouse antibodies such as 2b3 would prevent this type of reactions.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For instance, the development of anti-CAR immune responses in metastatic renal cell cancer patients treated with a murine anti-CAIX CAR was analyzed in detail, and it was postulated that T cell function and persistence may have been negatively impacted by this effect (Lamers et al, 2011). Most concerning, it was recently reported that repeated administration of murine CAR-engineered T cells led to development of antimouse antibody responses, associated with anaphylaxis and cardiac arrest in one subject (Maus et al, 2013). The use of a human antibody such as Ha1-4.117 instead of mouse antibodies such as 2b3 would prevent this type of reactions.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Previous studies targeting solid tumors using CAR T cells have resulted in numerous adverse events mediated by multiple mechanisms. [46][47][48] These events further drive the search for improved antigen selection. Previously published data using tTCR cells targeted to NY-ESO-1 demonstrated efficacy and, importantly, did not demonstrate on-target toxicity.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…High levels of anti-mouse antibodies and elevated serum tryptase levels implied an immunoglobulin E (IgE)-mediated anaphylactic reaction. 37 To facilitate long-term engraftment and allow for repetitive dosing as necessary, several investigators are making efforts to generate fully humanized CAR constructs.…”
Section: Allergic Reactions To Carsmentioning
confidence: 99%