1998
DOI: 10.1111/j.1399-3089.1998.tb00034.x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

T cell‐mediated xenograft rejection: Specific tolerance is probably required for long term xenograft survival

Abstract: T cell-mediated mechanisms of xenograft rejection appear resistant to standard immunosuppression protocols used to prevent allograft rejection and, consequently, higher doses of immunosuppressive drugs are required to promote xenograft compared to allograft survival. Evidence from recent studies suggests that porcine xenografts may be especially immunogenic in humans because of a prominent and vigorous indirect xenoresponse and because of the ability of porcine endothelium to activate human T cells. This has l… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

0
39
1
1

Year Published

2000
2000
2014
2014

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

2
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 65 publications
(41 citation statements)
references
References 117 publications
0
39
1
1
Order By: Relevance
“…The lack of preformed Abs and the failure of human NK cells to reconstitute the host enable the study of cell-mediated xenoresponses in the absence of hyperacute or acute vascular rejection. It is generally predicted that human anti-porcine T cell xenoresponses will be greater than alloresponses (3,4). The finding that pig skin xenografts are not rejected by human PBMC in SCID/ beige mice (17), in contrast to the marked infiltration and destruction of allografts in the same model (18 -21), is unexpected.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 42%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The lack of preformed Abs and the failure of human NK cells to reconstitute the host enable the study of cell-mediated xenoresponses in the absence of hyperacute or acute vascular rejection. It is generally predicted that human anti-porcine T cell xenoresponses will be greater than alloresponses (3,4). The finding that pig skin xenografts are not rejected by human PBMC in SCID/ beige mice (17), in contrast to the marked infiltration and destruction of allografts in the same model (18 -21), is unexpected.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 42%
“…Based on in vitro studies, it has been predicted that human anti-porcine cellular xenoresponses will be considerably greater than alloresponses (3,4). Human T cells directly recognize swine MHC class I and II molecules, resulting in more vigorous proliferative responses compared with allogeneic stimuli (5-7).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This is because mouse T-cells from a variety of inbred strains fail to mount primary in vitro responses to xenogeneic stimulators due to cross-species molecular incompatibilities that serve to limit the efficiency of direct xenorecognition (32). Even in those studies where a primary response to xenogeneic islets has been documented in vitro, it has often been shown to be dependent on the presence of recipient APCs, implying either a reliance on transcostimulation or an indirect presentation of processed xenoantigens (33).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, the immunosuppressive protocols currently employed to prevent rejection of human allografts are clearly inadequate at preventing porcine xenograft rejection: a greater degree of immunosuppression is required, and this is thought to be due to the vigorous anti-pig-specific human T cell response (31,32). Consequently, safer alternative protocols for suppressing host T cell responses will be needed if clinical xenotransplantation is to match the success of clinical allotransplantation.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%