2011
DOI: 10.1016/j.ijproman.2011.01.003
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Systems thinking in innovation project management: A match that works

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

3
84
0
10

Year Published

2012
2012
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
9
1

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 125 publications
(98 citation statements)
references
References 71 publications
3
84
0
10
Order By: Relevance
“…Systems thinking is a new concept in addressing competencies; accordingly, product invention, creativity, processes and/or business models require firm personnel to learn from experience in terms of both practice and theory to contribute to job performance and new firm projects [21,51,52]. Moreover, systems thinking can utilize multi-theories and techniques to build holistic, contingent perspectives and practices [53][54][55].…”
Section: Proposed Sbmcc Measuresmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Systems thinking is a new concept in addressing competencies; accordingly, product invention, creativity, processes and/or business models require firm personnel to learn from experience in terms of both practice and theory to contribute to job performance and new firm projects [21,51,52]. Moreover, systems thinking can utilize multi-theories and techniques to build holistic, contingent perspectives and practices [53][54][55].…”
Section: Proposed Sbmcc Measuresmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Systems Thinking successfully contributes to the governance of innovativeness, complexity and uncertainty by embedding flexibility in managerial activities (Kapsali, 2011). (Checkland, 2000) identifies two fundamental forms of Systems Thinking: hard and soft.…”
Section: Explains That Systemsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Something unusual begins here. Circular causality appears [6,11,18,38,47,48,61,62,65,70,71,77]. Kelly [19] identifies it as self-causality and physicists who deal with quantum mechanics call it acausality.…”
Section: Paradigm Of Uncertaintymentioning
confidence: 99%