2009
DOI: 10.1504/ijista.2009.024256
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Systems thinking benefits in supply change management: an illustration of the viable systems model in a Supply Chain

Abstract: Abstract:Existing product development models are solely an organisational matter. They do not take into consideration the whole Supply Chain (SC) and its different actors. In this article, we investigate how Supply Chain Management and Viable System Model (VSM) can support and create an effective use of information in product development and hence identify critical linkages in the SC. The aim is to introduce VSM as a framework that enables an analysis of companies' SCs and visualise vital inter-organisational … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
6
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 13 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 47 publications
(46 reference statements)
0
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Likewise previous applications of Viable System Model to Companies (Hoverstadt et al 2007;Espejo 1979;Al-Mutairi et al 2005;Chan 2011); Political Systems (Beer 1981); Insurance Sector (De Raadt 1987); Financial Sector (Trueba et al 2012); Innovation (Devine 2005;Amar et al 2006); Intranets (Nyström 2006); Project Management (Britton and Parker 1993;Morales et al 2012;Murad and Cavana 2012); Supply Chain (Chronéer and Mirijamdotter 2009;Badillo et al 2011); Health Sector (Monreal 2004;Midgley 2006); Energy Sector (Shaw et al 2004;Terra et al 2016); Education Sector (Ramírez et al 2009;Rojas and Tuesta 2011); Social Organizations (Espinosa and Walker 2013); Technology (Puche et al 2017); Service Science (Barile and Polese 2010); Sustainability (Schwaninger 2015); Hotels (Gmür et al 2010) and Communications (Espejo 2004); all intended to recommend improvement solutions in their respective fields.…”
Section: Document Sources Reviewmentioning
confidence: 83%
“…Likewise previous applications of Viable System Model to Companies (Hoverstadt et al 2007;Espejo 1979;Al-Mutairi et al 2005;Chan 2011); Political Systems (Beer 1981); Insurance Sector (De Raadt 1987); Financial Sector (Trueba et al 2012); Innovation (Devine 2005;Amar et al 2006); Intranets (Nyström 2006); Project Management (Britton and Parker 1993;Morales et al 2012;Murad and Cavana 2012); Supply Chain (Chronéer and Mirijamdotter 2009;Badillo et al 2011); Health Sector (Monreal 2004;Midgley 2006); Energy Sector (Shaw et al 2004;Terra et al 2016); Education Sector (Ramírez et al 2009;Rojas and Tuesta 2011); Social Organizations (Espinosa and Walker 2013); Technology (Puche et al 2017); Service Science (Barile and Polese 2010); Sustainability (Schwaninger 2015); Hotels (Gmür et al 2010) and Communications (Espejo 2004); all intended to recommend improvement solutions in their respective fields.…”
Section: Document Sources Reviewmentioning
confidence: 83%
“…VSM defines the system structure of a supply chain and organises collaboration, while TOC implements system behaviour, i.e., integrates processes and defines performance measures. Chronéer and Mirijamdotter (2009) examine how supply chain management and the Viable System Model (VSM) can support and create effective use of information in product development and thus identify critical links in a supply chain. Anderluh et al (2020) apply a model for the location selection of a midi-hub of a medium city centre in Vienna using an AHP (Analytic Hierarchy Process)-based decision-making support tool.…”
Section: Literature Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Among the different research streams that have contributed to the application of systems thinking for the study of social and economic dynamics, relevant stimuli have been offered by the Viable Systems Model (VSM) [61][62][63][64][65][66][67] and the Viable Systems Approach (VSA) [25,31,[68][69][70][71][72][73][74]. More specifically, the first one has offered a general representation of social and economic organizations, based on the functioning of human nervous system [75][76][77], while the second one has updated the managerial knowledge by investigating the dimensions that affect systems' behaviours and choices and by offering a systems representation for every kind of organized entity aimed to survive in a specific domain [78][79][80].…”
Section: A Systems View Of Cities and Citizensmentioning
confidence: 99%