Systems Engineering in Ship &Amp; Offshore Design 2012 2012
DOI: 10.3940/rina.sod.2012.10
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Systems Oriented Design in Maritime Design

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
3
1
1

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The contribution of this work of revision, analysis and updating of the Scenario Building methodology, therefore, sees the importance of the research phase not as a critical and superfluous step offering volatile hints without a possibility of concreteness; indeed, it is a fundamental phase, especially if spread throughout the process and not just its initial steps, because it empowers the scenario researcher or designer, creating awareness and helpful knowledge to make the scenario real, be it in the short, medium or long term. Just as the system is increasingly recognised as a living ecology that grows, declines, changes, and evolves (Sevaldson, 2022;Walker et al, 2004) the scenario has indeed similar intrinsic peculiarities. Even more revealing is the fact that a new awareness of Scenario Building towards sustainable transition has emerged from this analysis, namely the realisation that the scenario is not a static snapshot of something to be achieved, but is a dynamic ecosystem of actors, relationships, and actions in constant evolution.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The contribution of this work of revision, analysis and updating of the Scenario Building methodology, therefore, sees the importance of the research phase not as a critical and superfluous step offering volatile hints without a possibility of concreteness; indeed, it is a fundamental phase, especially if spread throughout the process and not just its initial steps, because it empowers the scenario researcher or designer, creating awareness and helpful knowledge to make the scenario real, be it in the short, medium or long term. Just as the system is increasingly recognised as a living ecology that grows, declines, changes, and evolves (Sevaldson, 2022;Walker et al, 2004) the scenario has indeed similar intrinsic peculiarities. Even more revealing is the fact that a new awareness of Scenario Building towards sustainable transition has emerged from this analysis, namely the realisation that the scenario is not a static snapshot of something to be achieved, but is a dynamic ecosystem of actors, relationships, and actions in constant evolution.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Gigamapping is one such framework that can allow for the involvement and discussion with stakeholders, including service staff, students and university staff. In Gigamaps, one can then use a 'ZIP approach' where you Zoom in, identify a Problem and suggest how to Intervene in the system (Sevaldson, 2012). The design PhD is expected to not only conduct individual research, but also to facilitate the co-design process bringing in the findings from the individual and community lense, and work through the three disciplinary perspectives to understand, How can existing formal and informal health services and service systems in Trondheim and Gjøvik be designed and implemented in a more useful, sustainable and holistic way?…”
Section: The System Lense: Looking For Synergies and Areas Of Interve...mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, it is essential to recognize that with the rapid development of the world, Service Design is facing increasingly significant complexity and large-scale problems brought about by the dynamic changes inside and outside the service systems, multi-actor dynamic interaction, and interdependence challenges in its environment (Dorst, 2015;Manzini, 2011;Villari, 2022;Vink, 2021). The interconnectedness of things brings complexity, so systems must be viewed holistically to identify effective leverage points and further foster systemic transformation (Meadows, 2008;Sevaldson, 2009).…”
Section: Theoretical Backgroundmentioning
confidence: 99%