2015
DOI: 10.1086/679651
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Systems of Value and the Changing Perception of Metal Commodities, ca. 4000–2600bc

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4
2
2

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 19 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 16 publications
(5 reference statements)
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The richness of goods in graves or hoards at Alaca Höyük, Horoztepe, and Eskiyapar has been mostly explained as elite groups controlling production and trade. The archival or sacrificial values of such ostentatious metals and their legitimacy through consumption of unique items have been discussed as important elements of value systems [ 21 23 ]. Arguments relating metals to elites are mostly based on the presence of fully flourishing trading activity in the early 2 nd millennium BC and the existence of certain nonlocal artifacts in Anatolia such as Syrian bottles, ivory, or lapis lazuli objects [ 4 ].…”
Section: The Archaeological Context: Social Inequality In the 3 ...mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The richness of goods in graves or hoards at Alaca Höyük, Horoztepe, and Eskiyapar has been mostly explained as elite groups controlling production and trade. The archival or sacrificial values of such ostentatious metals and their legitimacy through consumption of unique items have been discussed as important elements of value systems [ 21 23 ]. Arguments relating metals to elites are mostly based on the presence of fully flourishing trading activity in the early 2 nd millennium BC and the existence of certain nonlocal artifacts in Anatolia such as Syrian bottles, ivory, or lapis lazuli objects [ 4 ].…”
Section: The Archaeological Context: Social Inequality In the 3 ...mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A technological approach to metallurgy is visible in the other homelands of metallurgy, at the transition from the fifth to the fourth millennia bc . It is revealed by the small tools (chisels, awls, hooks and knives), weapons (projectile points, daggers, axes) or ornaments (rings, beads, pendants) produced in the earliest sites of extractive metallurgy (fifth millennium bc ) in Iran (Frame 2009), Anatolia and upper Euphrates (Stork 2013, 81; 2015, 117, 119), the Caucasus (Courcier 2014; Meliksetian 2011) and the Balkans (Antonovic 2002; Chernakov 2018; Jovanovic 2009). The absence of visible ritual dimension of metallurgy in these homelands, and the lack of processual artifacts, corroborate this premise.…”
Section: The Emergence Of the Technological Phasementioning
confidence: 99%
“…In this contribution the adopted focus shifts from object to practice, from the use of metal-made artifacts in ritual contexts to the conferment of ritual symbolisms to metallurgical settings and practices. Building upon longstanding anthropological debates on the subject 2 , the primary aim is to trace ways in which ritual ontologies might 1 Among different examples, the increase of metal hoards and metalwork in funerary assemblages across Near Eastern societies during the 4th and 3rd millennia BC has been attentively studied by scholars in terms of the application of diverging systems of ritual and economic value (Stork 2015). Rather than a result of fluctuating access to raw materials and finished products, the deliberate removal of conspicuous quantities of metal from exchange and production networks (via hoarding and burial practices) has been seen as a direct reflection of the symbolic value of metal artifacts to mediate, impose, and/or express wealth and power by emerging elites in comparison to the more controlled investment through similar practices enacted during the MBA and LBA (Bachhuber 2011).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%