Systems for routine surveillance for people with diabetes mellitus

Griffin, Sally; Kinmonth, A L

doi:10.1002/14651858.cd000541

Cited by 72 publications

(62 citation statements)

References 19 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Unclassified

Order By: Relevance

“…However, adolescents who wish to discuss health and risk behaviors with their clinicians do not always have the opportunity to do so [7]. Use of a screener may help promote clinician-patient discussion, either through prompting [22,23], by improving clinicians' selfefficacy in counseling adolescents [24], or both.…”

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Measuring Quality of Adolescent Preventive Services of Health Plan Enrollees and School-Based Health Center Users

Klein

Handwerker

Sesselberg

et al. 2007

Journal of Adolescent Health

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Measuring Quality of Adolescent Preventive Services of Health Plan Enrollees and School-Based Health Center Users

Klein

Handwerker

Sesselberg

et al. 2007

Journal of Adolescent Health

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

“…33 Multiple interventions with patient education and an enhanced nursing role had favourable effects on participants' health 35 and the routine review and recall of participants improved disease management. 34 However, initial positive outcomes appeared to be hard to sustain over the longer term. 12 As part of the initial scoping exercise five other key reviews were identified through electronic database searches.…”

Section: Previous Reviewsmentioning

confidence: 99%

UK self-care support initiatives for older patients with long-term conditions: a review

Berzins

Reilly

et al. 2009

Chronic Illness

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…The value of medical management in diabetes is widely accepted (Diabetes Control and Complications Trial Research Group, 1993;UK Prospective Diabetes Study Group, 1998), as is the evidence for systematic approaches to implementing this (Griffin and Kinmonth, 2000;Renders et al, 2000). While most of the organizational literature is beyond the scope of this review, the review of the effectiveness of disease and case management for diabetes by Norris et al (2002a) seems relevant.…”

Section: The Professional's Storymentioning

confidence: 99%

Personalized care planning for diabetes: policy lessons from systematic reviews of consultation and self-management interventions

Graffy

Eaton

Sturt

et al. 2009

PHC

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Aim: To determine whether a process of care planning for people with diabetes, combining a patient-centred approach by practitioners with measures to promote selfmanagement by patients, improve health outcomes. Background: Health policy, in many countries, seeks to engage people with long-term conditions in protecting their health. This review was conducted by members of a working group established by the Department of Health and Diabetes, UK to consider the potential for personalized care planning in UK diabetes services. Methods: Review of systematic reviews. The Cochrane Library and Database of Reviews of Effectiveness were searched to identify reviews concerned with components of care planning. Reviews conducted before 1990, and those involving education outside the consultation were excluded. Abstracts were reviewed and data extraction undertaken by reviewers working independently in pairs. Results: In all, 86 reviews were identified as potentially relevant and 22 included. Patient-focused interventions, such as pre-consultation prompts, enhanced the role patients played in consultations. Personalized approaches using tailored information influenced health behaviour more than uniform approaches. Decision aids and computerized knowledge management improved the process of decision-making. Although effective communication was important, focusing solely on changing practitioner behaviour appeared inadequate. Taken together, there was good evidence that the processes involved in personalized care planning would engage patients more effectively in managing their care, but little robust research on the impact on health outcomes of doing so. Conclusions: The present review identifies effective interventions that are available for clinicians to use in diabetes consultations, but engaging patients requires more than this. Mechanisms to share information and decision-making need further development and evaluation to assess their impact on health outcomes. Narrowly targeted interventions focused on practitioner behaviour appear less effective than whole-system approaches. Personalized care planning offers a mechanism to integrate patient-centred medicine and support for self-management to improve diabetes care.

show abstract

Systems for routine surveillance for people with diabetes mellitus

Cited by 72 publications

References 19 publications

Measuring Quality of Adolescent Preventive Services of Health Plan Enrollees and School-Based Health Center Users

Measuring Quality of Adolescent Preventive Services of Health Plan Enrollees and School-Based Health Center Users

UK self-care support initiatives for older patients with long-term conditions: a review

Personalized care planning for diabetes: policy lessons from systematic reviews of consultation and self-management interventions

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About