2016
DOI: 10.1182/blood-2016-07-726547
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Systems analysis uncovers inflammatory Th/Tc17-driven modules during acute GVHD in monkey and human T cells

Abstract: • The transcriptional networks controlling breakthrough acute GVHD can be mapped, and correlate closely with clinical disease.• Breakthrough acute GVHD is transcriptionally controlled by T-cell persistence, inflammation, and Th/Tc17 skewing.One of the central challenges of transplantation is the development of alloreactivity despite the use of multiagent immunoprophylaxis. Effective control of this immune suppression-resistant T-cell activation represents one of the key unmet needs in the fields of both solid-… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

4
56
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
8
2

Relationship

4
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 40 publications
(60 citation statements)
references
References 57 publications
(62 reference statements)
4
56
0
Order By: Relevance
“…17,48 In the setting of acute GVHD, a recent study found that acute GVHD breaking through immune suppression was typified by T-cell persistence, as well as pro-inflammatory and Th/Tc17 transcriptional biases. 49 Here, we describe a T-cell lineage highly concordant with these observations, sharing the hallmarks of persistence, highly proinflammatory phenotype, and the Th17 transcriptional program.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 56%
“…17,48 In the setting of acute GVHD, a recent study found that acute GVHD breaking through immune suppression was typified by T-cell persistence, as well as pro-inflammatory and Th/Tc17 transcriptional biases. 49 Here, we describe a T-cell lineage highly concordant with these observations, sharing the hallmarks of persistence, highly proinflammatory phenotype, and the Th17 transcriptional program.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 56%
“…However, although sirolimus has several pro-tolerogenic mechanistic advantages, it is still not understood how best to deploy this agent, and it currently remains a second line therapy that is not clinically superior to CNI (5, 6). This lack of clinical superiority is due to a number of factors: First, post-transplant monotherapy with sirolimus, in the absence of adjunctive pre-transplant GVHD prevention (7, 8) is unable to sufficiently control Teff activation and, thus cannot in itself prevent GVHD (3, 9). Further, combination strategies that pair sirolimus with CNI or inhibitors of proliferation (such as mycophenolate mofetil (MMF) or methotrexate) have not improved rates of GVHD (6, 10, 11), likely due to the antagonistic impact of these agents on Treg function.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In addition, different surface markers have been described, such as chemokine receptor 6 (CCR6), CD161, CCR4, IL-23R, and CD5L to characterize the Th17 subset (17,18). Several studies have attempted to decipher the role of Th17 in aGvHD (19,20). However, murine models presented conflicting results, as IL-17-KO donor T cells either reduced (21) or exacerbated aGvHD (22).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%