2014
DOI: 10.1016/j.jhep.2014.06.019
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Systemic therapy in HCC: Lessons from brivanib

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
16
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 16 publications
(16 citation statements)
references
References 14 publications
0
16
0
Order By: Relevance
“…As a matter of fact in the second‐line Brisk‐PS study of brivanib the survival times of patients on active treatment were not significantly longer than those in the placebo group . Reassessment of survival figures of the placebo arm of numerous randomized control trials disclosed a significant heterogeneity of survival, likely reflecting inclusion of patients at different stages of tumor disease and with different molecular and biological profiles of their tumors, a variable that is not incorporated in any tumor staging system, as already demonstrated in previous meta‐analyses . This makes it even more compelling to standardize the assessment of survival in treated patients with respect to sorafenib interruption with the aims of (1) evaluating the natural history and validating the predictive power of biological or radiological surrogate markers, (2) controlling for confounding factors in observational studies, (3) calculating the sample size and stratifying subjects in phase II and III randomized control trials, and (4) assessing treatment effect size to formulate therapeutic strategies.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 89%
“…As a matter of fact in the second‐line Brisk‐PS study of brivanib the survival times of patients on active treatment were not significantly longer than those in the placebo group . Reassessment of survival figures of the placebo arm of numerous randomized control trials disclosed a significant heterogeneity of survival, likely reflecting inclusion of patients at different stages of tumor disease and with different molecular and biological profiles of their tumors, a variable that is not incorporated in any tumor staging system, as already demonstrated in previous meta‐analyses . This makes it even more compelling to standardize the assessment of survival in treated patients with respect to sorafenib interruption with the aims of (1) evaluating the natural history and validating the predictive power of biological or radiological surrogate markers, (2) controlling for confounding factors in observational studies, (3) calculating the sample size and stratifying subjects in phase II and III randomized control trials, and (4) assessing treatment effect size to formulate therapeutic strategies.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 89%
“…Secondly, improved hepatic reserve phenotyping might help mitigating the risks stemming from systemic toxicity, a nontrivial issue in patients with HCC where treatment discontinuation due to AEs is higher than other malignancies, and has in the past led to the premature termination of development of sunitinib due to concerns over excessive mortality in the treatment arm. Although exploring the relationship between ALBI grade and toxicity from systemic treatment was beyond the aims of our study, this should be formally evaluated in future prospective trials.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…HCC is a highly angiogenic malignancy, which is characterized by a high propensity for vascular invasion [22]. Increasing studies have reported that miRNAs regulated hepatocarcinogenesis-related gene expression, indicating a new insight in the initiation and progression of HCC [23].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%