1999
DOI: 10.1111/j.1445-5994.1999.tb01587.x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Systemic sclerosis prevalence and mortality in Sydney 1974‐88

Abstract: This study has demonstrated systemic sclerosis prevalence and mortality rates comparable to overseas estimates, consistently higher prevalence and mortality rates in females than males, proportionally higher rates of diffuse disease in males than females and in deceased cases than living cases, a diffuse: limited disease ratio apparently stable over time, apparently increasing temporal prevalence and mortality rates and, by implication, rising incidence rates. The observed temporal rise in diffuse disease prev… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

2
43
0
1

Year Published

2003
2003
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
4

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 55 publications
(46 citation statements)
references
References 11 publications
2
43
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Those investigators estimated the point prevalence of SSc to be 233 cases per million (based on 348 cases), with an annual incidence of 16 cases per million. In contrast, a lower prevalence of SSc was reported in the Australian city of Sydney (state of New South Wales) (86 cases per million for 1988) (38). Reasons for the difference between these 2 adjacent regions are not clear.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 91%
“…Those investigators estimated the point prevalence of SSc to be 233 cases per million (based on 348 cases), with an annual incidence of 16 cases per million. In contrast, a lower prevalence of SSc was reported in the Australian city of Sydney (state of New South Wales) (86 cases per million for 1988) (38). Reasons for the difference between these 2 adjacent regions are not clear.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 91%
“…Attribution bias in the manner in which death certificates are completed may be another explanation for our observation. However, methodological research suggests that while death certificate data tend to underestimate SSc mortality the bias is likely to be constant over time [23].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…In three, the strategy applied is in conflict with the ICD coding instructions for selecting the underlying cause of death that will appear in the mortality statistics. In two further cases, classification examples are provided that are in conflict with the ICD instructions [25,26]. None of the studies using classification principles other than those of the ICD point out this fact, or discuss why the international conventions have not been applied.…”
Section: Identifying a Principal Cause Of Death (Table 3)mentioning
confidence: 95%