2008
DOI: 10.1016/j.transproceed.2008.02.045
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Systemic Lupus Erythematosus After Renal Transplantation: Is Complement a Good Marker for Graft Survival?

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2010
2010
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
4
3

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 16 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 9 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Comparative studies131 132 and cases series133 134 support that patients with SLE are good candidates for renal transplantation performed when clinical (and ideally, serological) lupus activity is absent, or at a low level, for at least 3–6 months135; best results are obtained with living donor136–138 and pre-emptive transplantation 139. Patients with moderate to high titres of anti-phospholipid antibodies are at increased risk for thrombotic complications and may receive anticoagulants perioperatively 140–143.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Comparative studies131 132 and cases series133 134 support that patients with SLE are good candidates for renal transplantation performed when clinical (and ideally, serological) lupus activity is absent, or at a low level, for at least 3–6 months135; best results are obtained with living donor136–138 and pre-emptive transplantation 139. Patients with moderate to high titres of anti-phospholipid antibodies are at increased risk for thrombotic complications and may receive anticoagulants perioperatively 140–143.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The discordant histological findings seen in the present case may be the result of overlapping chronic endothelial injury manifesting as transplant glomerulopathy and mesangial deposition of immune complex associated with RLN. Post‐transplant proteinuria with low complement level in SLE recipients was reportedly a risk factor for recurrence of immune deposits (10). The relative paucity of immune deposit and non‐specific findings of IF in this case may be a result of prolonged immunosuppressive therapy (11).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%