2020
DOI: 10.21203/rs.3.rs-33775/v2
|View full text |Cite
Preprint
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Systemic inflammation and chronic kidney disease in a patient due to the RNASEH2B defect

Abstract: Introduction: Aicardi-Goutières (AGS) is a rare immune dysregulated disease due to mutations in TREX1, RNASEH2A, RNASEH2B, RNASEH2C, SAMHD1, ADAR1, or IFIH1. Clinical features include basal ganglia calcifications, white matter abnormalities, and cerebral atrophy. Severe systemic inflammation and chronic kidney disease (CKD) are extremely rare in AGS. Herein, we report a patient presenting with systemic inflammation and CKD to broaden the clinical phenotype spectrum of the RNASEH2B defect. Methods: All testing … Show more

Help me understand this report
View published versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
2

Relationship

0
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 19 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Our data suggest that type I IFN pathways may not be the major driver of disease in AGS with a relevant contribution of DNA damage-associated apoptotic and proinflammatory responses. In agreement, both TREX1 and RNASEH2B deficiencies have been clinically associated with inflammatory symptoms such as inflammatory myopathy (Tumiene et al, 2017) and systemic inflammation (He et al, 2021). Although links between JAK-STAT signaling, type I IFN induction, and neurotoxicity warrant further investigation in our experimental system through pharmacological inhibitors such as ruxolitinib, IFNα receptor blocking antibodies, or genetic modifications of key players, our observations are in line with a recent report in which type I IFN-independent genomic instability was shown to cause AGS-like cell toxicity in a murine model of neural Rnaseh2b inactivation (Aditi et al, 2021).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 66%
“…Our data suggest that type I IFN pathways may not be the major driver of disease in AGS with a relevant contribution of DNA damage-associated apoptotic and proinflammatory responses. In agreement, both TREX1 and RNASEH2B deficiencies have been clinically associated with inflammatory symptoms such as inflammatory myopathy (Tumiene et al, 2017) and systemic inflammation (He et al, 2021). Although links between JAK-STAT signaling, type I IFN induction, and neurotoxicity warrant further investigation in our experimental system through pharmacological inhibitors such as ruxolitinib, IFNα receptor blocking antibodies, or genetic modifications of key players, our observations are in line with a recent report in which type I IFN-independent genomic instability was shown to cause AGS-like cell toxicity in a murine model of neural Rnaseh2b inactivation (Aditi et al, 2021).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 66%
“…However, on the basis of these findings some assumptions can be made, since, indeed, the first 6 genes with higher expression in individuals with clinical infection compared to asymptomatic individuals, namely IFIT3, IFI44L, FOLR3, RSAD3, PI3, and ALOX15 , share some common characteristics that can be relevant. For example, IFIT3, IFI44L and RSAD3 expression can be induced by viruses which in turn enhances the progress of the viral infection ( 62 64 ), whereas higher intrinsic expression of IFIT3, FOLR3, PI3 and ALOX-15 have all been associated with immune-mediated chronic diseases ( 65 68 ) In contrast, a protective effect of GZMH, CLEC1B, CLEC12A , that have a higher expression in asymptomatic individuals, may be associated with the effectiveness of GZMH in viral eradication ( 69 ) and the ability of CLEC1B and CLEC12A to enhance neutrophil extracellular trap formation, thus presenting an antiviral effect that helps to control systemic virus levels ( 70 ). Despite the fact that our findings have to be validated in a larger independent cohort of prior SARS-CoV-2 infected individuals, taken together with those of the literature support the hypothesis that there are differences in the innate immune responses between clinical and asymptomatic individuals during SARS-CoV-2 infections ( 15 , 16 ).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%