2018
DOI: 10.1136/bmjopen-2018-023061
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Systemic immunomodulatory treatments for atopic dermatitis: protocol for a systematic review with network meta-analysis

Abstract: IntroductionThere are numerous new systemic treatments for atopic dermatitis in various stages of development and most are being compared with placebo rather than active comparators. In order to understand the relative efficacy and safety of existing and new treatments for atopic dermatitis, robust mixed comparisons (ie, direct and indirect) would be beneficial. To address this gap, this protocol describes methods for a systematic review and network meta-analysis of systemic treatments for atopic dermatitis.Me… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

4
96
0
4

Year Published

2019
2019
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
9
1

Relationship

2
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 56 publications
(104 citation statements)
references
References 41 publications
4
96
0
4
Order By: Relevance
“…This SR is the most up to date review on the effectiveness, safety and economic impact on dupilumab in AD. Similar to previous SRs the current analysis reinforces the short-term (16 weeks) efficacy of dupilumab in improving SCORAD, EASI, IGA, pruritus, and quality of life (49,50,51). In addition, the current SR provides evidence for long-term (52 weeks) benefit in adults.…”
Section: Current Report In the Context Of Previous Researchsupporting
confidence: 82%
“…This SR is the most up to date review on the effectiveness, safety and economic impact on dupilumab in AD. Similar to previous SRs the current analysis reinforces the short-term (16 weeks) efficacy of dupilumab in improving SCORAD, EASI, IGA, pruritus, and quality of life (49,50,51). In addition, the current SR provides evidence for long-term (52 weeks) benefit in adults.…”
Section: Current Report In the Context Of Previous Researchsupporting
confidence: 82%
“…More high‐quality evidence is needed. Large, well‐designed prospective patient cohorts (for real‐life data) or (living) network meta‐analyses24 might provide the data that are needed, and might provide guidance on the treatment of subgroups, for example. The TREAT Registry Taskforce25 has developed a core dataset that can aid in gathering comparable data26,27 and that is already used in many national research registries (https://treat-registry-taskforce.org/).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Approved systemic treatment options in patients with moderate–severe disease are limited, with many medications being used off‐label. A review is currently underway with the aim of providing a comprehensive, comparative evaluation of systemic treatments in AD including ciclosporin, methotrexate, azathioprine, mycophenolate, corticosteroids, interferon‐gamma, intravenous immunoglobulin, dupilumab and other novel systemic agents . Recognising that current data are limited, and that new treatment options are becoming available, several recommendations were made regarding potential treatment pathways with regard to systemic therapies (Fig.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%